Results 561 – 580 of about 37000.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: Posting frequency?
|
| I think what we can safely conclude from this thread is that: 1) there are lies, damned lies and statistics (I apparently have posted 287, 321 or 481 times in 2002) 2) no matter how you caculate it, Larry posted most :-) 3) people need to learn to (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
| |
|  
frequency
(score: 0.516)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| --snip-- (...) I must admit that I hadn't realised it was so hard to post now. That, IMO, means we need somewhere new to discuss LDraw. If new people can't easily post in discussions then we are killing fresh discussion and that is a very bad move. (...) (15 years ago, 19-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.516)
|
|
| | LDraw Chat Room?
|
| (...) Yes, didn't I? Almost twice as long as your post... ;) (...) Isn't MLCad freeware? I didn't know that. But then again, I'm not an MLCad user. I don't know about a dedicated LDraw chat. Would it really be populated? There's nothing that stops (...) (15 years ago, 22-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.516)
|
|
| | Re: New Robot: V. I. Rooster
|
| Hey cool, I like the 4 parts that make the spine. Good to see you post again. Peace. Eric Sophie Legomaster Biomechanical Bricks (15 years ago, 24-Mar-10, to lugnet.space)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.516)
|
|
| | Bricklink Forums, home of the 1/2 truth!
|
| Howdy all. I woke up this morning to a pile of emails from people! Including one from the new store. So I can cut and paste too. So here is my response to the 1/2 truths of The Bricklink Forum. Funny, if I post this in bricklink (well I am not (...) (15 years ago, 26-Mar-10, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.516)
|
|
| | Re: Bricklink Forums, home of the 1/2 truth!
|
| Funny, I just checked the forums again. No one bothered to answer me here. They continue to attack people in their own little part of the world. So let me address these 'people', and make it a point to address the king of the haters club. 1.) I was (...) (15 years ago, 26-Mar-10, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.516)
|
|
| | Re: Bricklink Forums, home of the 1/2 truth!
|
| See Jon, you and Dan are tied at the hip. Whether you want to be or not, his meddling, in my eyes, has tarnished whatever you are trying to do. answer;Thanks, but I can read on my own. Interesting. So anytime anyone I know does anything on bricklink (...) (15 years ago, 26-Mar-10, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.516)
|
|
| | Re: Bricklink Forums, home of the 1/2 truth!
|
| So the 1st part of the Banned Dan website is done. Will spend some time doing spell checks. This idea was put in place when a local person was screwed by a business. That person was so mad he put up a sign accross from the business stating his case. (...) (15 years ago, 26-Mar-10, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.516)
|
|
| | Re: A Generic Idea
|
| "Steve Baker" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message news:3E171F4A.400050...ail.net... (...) :) (...) inventions (...) I'm (...) IR-connected (...) enough (...) would (...) processing. (...) legally (...) country. (...) at (...) Ok, if radio (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.516)
|
|
| | Re: A Generic Idea
|
| (...) You could use an alternate firmware that can generate any tone, a custom modulation-demodulation protocol, and a condenser microphone soldered onto a sensor wire to send at reasonable bitrates for robot communication. Of course, it would take (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.516)
|
|
| | Re: 4x2ReVu: 7079 Drawbridge Defence
|
| ....REWRITE / FORMATTING.... !!! 4x2ReVu Stats !!! Rating: Six out of eight studs. Thumbs up for: Good structure, great model and assortment of figures makes for an excellent standalone set. Thumbs down on: I don't like the price (even considering (...) (15 years ago, 25-Mar-10, to lugnet.reviews, FTX)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.516)
|
|
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.515)
|
|
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.515)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) The ones I typically visit (ClassicSpace.com, CrownVic.net, and etc.) all visually show threads with new responses in another color. Some even show you how many new replies there have been since I last visited. It's easy to see what to click (...) (15 years ago, 22-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.515)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) Hmmm, did you click "Reply" so quickly that you missed the very next sentence in the previous post where it said, "I think you've just been here too long"? Like many of us, you've been here forever. So perhaps you don't realize that it's (...) (15 years ago, 19-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.515)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) I tend to agree with you... Anyway it may be OK to post images (though I don't like the way we are supposed to browse them), but it's definitely not a place for serious discussion, as comments are not searchable. Philo (15 years ago, 17-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.515)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) You must have done something to make it that hard for you to use Lugnet. I just click "Reply", write my response, click "Preview" and "Post". Everything else is already filled out. Play well, Jacob (15 years ago, 19-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.515)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) I very strongly second this. I've been lurking here for years now, but almost never post, and never get involved, because of how awkward, old & user-unfriendly LUGNET is. I think LUGNET is a huge deterrent to any potential LDraw newcomers & (...) (15 years ago, 16-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.515)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) Yes, maybe it is a generation issue. I followed the link (URL) and I didn't like what I saw. I mean, most of the replies were in deed positive and encouraging, but the layout of the site... No tree structure but just a linear thread. Scroll, (...) (15 years ago, 15-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.515)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) Heh, don't apologize - it's great to hear from LUGNET users why they like this place! My view is about 100% opposite from yours ;) Yes, you need a flickr account, but you need to join here too, which we agree is painful. When you joined (...) (15 years ago, 16-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.515)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
