LUGNET News : Search Results: post frequency


Search Results: post frequency

Results 1321 – 1340 of about 37000.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
(...) That number doesn't actually exist anywhere until display time. That is, the initial 50 is never stored anywhere, and won't be reported to clients. It'll be up to clients to add in the 50 or whatever value they choose for whatever group(s) the (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
(...) Yup, that's what I mean. It'll be up to the client to calculate the ratings from the set of raw inputs for each article. --Todd (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
(...) No, I wouldn't be that cruel! :) :) (...) Absolutely, it can, yes. :) Any integer in the range 0 to 100 inclusive. The histogram display on the website snaps values to the nearest 10-stop. (...) Cool! --Todd (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
(...) No, that's correct. Articles are, groups aren't. But a client could, if it wanted to, start messages off with any default number (not necessarily 50) based on which group(s) the article appears in. (...) The server does store the new composite (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
(...) The downside, as I see it :) is that if the client just gets back one number per article somehow, it's an afternoon/evening hack to add this to a newsreader (like slrn) which already has GroupLens support. If the client has to actually process (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
(...) "Not as useful" doesn't mean "not exactly what Matthew wants". grin (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
(...) Oh! YES! Thank you. That exactly. (...) Yop! --Todd (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
(...) Sorry, yah, I meant "not as maximally useful." --Todd (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
(...) Well, I think it'd happen whenever slrn grabs headers for a newsgroup. That too much? (That would be in the case where there were a cgi which would take a list of articles [1] and return all values somehow. If it were a one request, one result (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Post from email?
HI ALL....the newsgroup digests that channel through e-mail ask that you DO NOT reply to message, but to reply to the original web page, (link provided) Can anyone explain if it is possable to DIRECTLY e-mail the newsgroup? I do not always have web (...) (24 years ago, 29-Apr-00, to lugnet.general)

post
(score: 1.024)

		(canceled)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Re: Post Flyer to BAYLUG site?
couldn't hurt (unless the page is 350KB ;-) -Z- -- Zonker Harris (zonkerh@corp.webtv.net, zonker@gnac.com) GNAC Broadband Network Architect, Microsoft Broadband Deployment MS-SVC-1:2179 1065 La Avenida, Mt. View, CA v) 650.693.8403 f) 650.693.0202 (24 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Re: Post Count
(...) well, thats assuming that the rate of posting has been pretty much constant... I bet it didn't start off with 173 posts/day though, so we'll probably get there sooner :) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Re: Post Count
(...) I'm sure it didn't, and, sorry, but I'm not gonna go through all 200,000 posts and figure out how many were on each day. Somebody else could though. ;) Kevin Mc. (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Re: Post Count
(...) I didn't think it sounded right: 804 days :) New number as of 3:09 PM on Dec. 11, 2000: 199,450 posts. 248.07 posts a day. #200,000 will be in about 2.22 (not kidding) days. (Friday at 8:20 AM[this number will be way off, depending on the # of (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Re: Post Count
(...) There have been 234 today at 3:16 PM CST (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Re: Post Count
(...) There are now 199,532 at 8:18 PM CST. That's 289 today. (...) That'd be cool, but I really doubt there should be a prize. I mean, someone could figure who was 100,000th or 50,000th. P.S. Anyone wishing to check this go to (URL) , scroll down, (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Re: Post Count
There are now a mere 198 more posts to go, which should be sometime early tomorrow, to reach 200,000 posts since LUGNET was inaugurated. 199,802 now, counting mine. Kevin (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.general)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Re: Post Count
I noticed that all the links go through jump.cgi. Do you keep any stats on the number of links navigated / to where / etc? ROSCO (...) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

post
(score: 1.024)

		Re: Post Count
(...) Yeah, Todd keep the stats - I think it's more where from than where to. I'd show you some posts but the search options aer disabled just now... -Shiri (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

post
(score: 1.024)

More: Next Page >>