Results 961 – 980 of about 16000.
|
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: ATSF Super Chief Project
|
| (...) Not completely mine! lots of ideas from others there. (...) Cool. I could never get the builder to email me so I had to guess. But at 6 wide the trucks must stick out quite a bit. I had a version copied and I just didn't like how much bulge (...) (20 years ago, 1-Feb-05, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|  
pieniazek
(score: 0.345)
|
|
| | Re: ATSF Super Chief Project
|
| (...) er no, I mean 10025 and apparently that's an endemic error, it's in all my MOCpages stuff too (and the folder description on BL and etc...).... sigh. Sloppy sloppy. Chalk it up to excitement. For the record, no Bionicle parts were used in the (...) (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| | Re: ALCo and EMD
|
| (...) What do you mean by that exactly, does ILW have licenses for stuff from both builders and uses some tech each way, or was this unit a rebuild? It's not unheard of to hear of RS-lls or FAs that got their 244s pulled and replaced with 567s or (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| | ATSF Super Chief Project
|
| People that know me well, know that as a railfan I have been a fan of ATSF since I could spell it, almost 40 years ago. And I've been an Alco fan almost as long. When LEGO brought out 10020 I was overjoyed to see a warbonnet set, but I knew that as (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jan-05, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.trains) !!
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| | Re: MOC 8436: Cranetruck
|
| (...) I'm not sure I agree with that. There were, as I recall, some difficult insertion steps but overall, it seemed buildable. The root problem in my view is just that the mean time to failure of individual constructed components (given reliability (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| | Re: MOC 8436: Cranetruck
|
| (...) VERY cool. GREAT news. Presumably you are under NDA and maybe shouldn't have even said that much (smile) but... go you! Congrats and we'll all be waiting to see what happens... (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.technic, FTX)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| | Re: MOC 8436: Cranetruck
|
| (...) That was from LEGOWorld, October 2003 in Holland. It was an automated car assembly line, consisting of RCX controlled work carriers that travelled from cell to cell across a number of cells. Each cell had a selection of parts that it added in (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| | Re: Bricksaic version 0.1.0
|
| (...) I ran into this too while betatesting. If you were using, for example, MLCad, it might be a problem with the color definitions that MLCad is aware of. Bricksiac is getting its color info from the ldconfig.ldr file in the install dir, I think. (...) (20 years ago, 28-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.mosaic, lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| | Re: MOC 8436: Cranetruck
|
| (...) (snip) (...) Wow! Superb model, and great presentation, your photography technique is very good. of course the most impressive bit is that you did it all with 8436. Wouldn't it be great if LEGO started making fan created alternate model (...) (20 years ago, 28-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.technic, FTX)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
| (...) Me too. Not because I thought it was real, but because I wanted to see if Mark had managed to arrange something(1) (or find something) that somehow fit. I thought it was a great joke. 1 - in FTX, the link displayed isn't necessarily the link (...) (20 years ago, 28-Jan-05, to lugnet.fun.holiday, FTX)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| | Many thanks!
|
| Hi all, I'd like to thank all of you who have responded to me either on LUGNET or offline with comments and suggestions - I really appeciate them. And thanks for all the kind words and compliments, but I need to give credit to my staff... the (...) (19 years ago, 24-Jun-05, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish.brickjournal)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
| (...) Dave, you already have one, from what I hear... :-) (...) Actually I'm not at *all* unhappy with that nickname, I'll wear it proudly. After all, I *am* "goodhearted", I try to always expect the best from companies and from people. How sad it (...) (20 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| | Re: BNSF new paint
|
| (...) this new logo is introducing incompatability in my collection! Larry Pieniazek, BNSF fan since they merged, 2004 BNSF transportation purchases: 0, 2005 BNSF transportatoin purchases (after the new logos and paint): 0... That'll show them! (1) (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
| (...) I'm not sure that's necessarily a valid conclusion. Another possible conclusion is that you were wrong, but LEGO is such a good company at heart that they apologised anyway in the interests of peace and harmony. (20 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
|
| | LUGNET Admin Resignation
|
| This note is from Kelly McKiernan, Larry Pieniazek, Lenny Hoffman, Tim Courtney, and Frank Filz. There's been a bit of conversation about the reasons behind these members discontinuing admin duties here at LUGNET. Rather than posting a huge (...) (19 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.344)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
