LUGNET News : Search Results: pieniazek


Search Results: pieniazek

Results 4781 – 4800 of about 16000.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: This should be required reading for this group...
(...) But not always, regrettably. Yes, I agree. It is good to be able to remind people that debate involves reason or it isn't debate. Interesting discussion perhaps but not debate. We have a number of high quality debaters here and I think we all (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Re: This should be required reading for this group...
(...) Interesting article but I couldn't tell what it was you thought were doing when you cited it. :-) Or why it's a must read. The people that would benefit from reading it won't do so or won't understand the point it makes. :-) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Re: Big things (was Re: For Those That Don't Get the 2nd Amendement (was Re: Those stupid liberal))
The following post of James's is off-topic for debate. :-) But it's neat anyway. XFUT geek Let's see, we have John Deere prototyping walker/spider timber harvesters, and Caterpillar prototyping mechs. What's next? GM showing hovercars? Turboprop (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Re: Layout and train MOCs: part 3
(...) Oooh, that Bavarianish train is really cute. Good 3 axle cars! I especially like the shields, are those prototypical? (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.trains)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Re: For Those That Don't Get the 2nd Amendement (was Re: Those stupid liberal)
(...) I hear you. And if person X says "this is what person Y meant" I tend to discount that. Especially if it's some time later. But if person X says "this is what I meant when I wrote this 2 months ago" I tend to give that a lot of credence. And (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Re: Cathedral Boardgame
(...) You did an awesome job on these! I'd buy a set of these if you made up instructions and parts.. how hard are the parts to come by? There are currently custom kit sellers selling Chess pieces and boards but no other games that I know of yet... (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.gaming)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Re: Jocular self-deprecation (Re: Those stupid conservative (was liberal) judges are at it again!)
(...) Weirdly, the web view truncated this topic to just "Jocular self-deprecation judges are at it again!)" in the top five list on the right. Can that be fixed? It made me smile but other truncation may cause confusion. (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.suggestions)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Re: For Those That Don't Get the 2nd Amendement (was Re: Those stupid liberal)
(...) No, I don't think it can be creditably argued... again, the Federalist Papers are clear on this point, the intent was that arms means the best technology available at the time to armies, or better, if it was commercially available. To me that (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Re: new waggons by Huw Millington
(...) I freely admit inspiration from James Mathis on that one, he posted some Maerklin stuff and had built a trafo car... I dug around at various sites looking for real and toy drop center cars and trafos seem the most common loads so that is what (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.trains)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Medical Marijuana
From the LP newsletter I get, posted in its entireity... poses an interesting dilemna with respect to states rights and how far a state can go in deviating, and how far a state can go in resisting encroachment on states rights - start - Libertarians (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Re: BBS systems and Planet Busters
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snipped stuff about the BBS scene and my game, Planet Busters> Well we are at an intergame point again, if you have an interest in playing this blast from the past (and possibly trouncing me at (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		The first smiley?
Possibly apocryphal, possibly not really the first but an interesting story of computer archeaology nontheless: (URL) got the URL from an old IBMers mailing list I am on) I don't think it has anything to do with MS other than that's where the story (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Re: new waggons by Huw Millington
(...) to drop center flats. You can see another approach here... (URL) had chosen to have end railings (simulating a car that has many more wheels than the car actually does) rather than extending the ends as far as Huw did. Huw needs a bigger load (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.trains)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
Much snippage (...) It's in the federalist papers (which I would argue, since they are by the authors of the constitution and which are contemporaneous, ARE valid as a way to gauge meaning and intent) but I forget exactly. I don't think it's any of (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Re: Those stupid conservative (was liberal) judges are at it again!
(...) Depends on who you ask. Most judges will tell you it is not your place as a juror to weigh the justness of the law, that your duty is only to the validity and applicability of the facts and that you have no power to judge (nullify) law. (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Re: New Lego engine with promotion for the Legoland park....
(...) Chances are he probably could not answer that under the terms of his non disclosure (...) but even if he could, he almost certainly can't answer that one. But his NDA could be different than mine, of course. (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.trains)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Re: Those stupid conservative (was liberal) judges are at it again!
(...) Check. OK, how about a "duty" that it's OK to shirk, but that if you don't shirk, gets you something extra, some privilege (I just can't spell that word!) you'd normally not get. (c.f. _Starship Troopers_ in which only those that served in the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
(...) Bzzt. LEGO(r) is off topic for this group. :-) (...) Me too but that's irrelevant. (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Re: For Those That Don't Get the 2nd Amendement (was Re: Those stupid liberal)
(...) The point I just made to Bruce stands here too. You don't get to use "common, everyday english". The phrase "well regulated militia" does not mean what you think it does. It means what it meant then, with the meanings of the words as they were (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

		Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
(...) Let me try... I don't know about Chris, but I personally misunderstood this: (...) I'm taking it to mean that you think we have to use the constitution's exact words only and not any contemporaneous writings by the same authors which expand (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.261)

More: Next Page >>