|
 | | 8880 Super Car (Parts Wheels & Tires [2997][2998]
|
| Sorry for the delay, but in the last few days I have been pilling work over work, and I didn't have a moment to spare, but know a welcome slow doen, so go check the Dat files, in lugnet.cad.dat.parts@lugnet.com with the same subject of this message. (...) (23 years ago, 4-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|  
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: LDR - New LDraw File Extension
|
| (...) This is Not exactly required! (...) Yes, but it will break compatibility, with older programs. (...) Don't really know. (...) So, the actual goal, of switching to an unambigous extension, doesn't really work, because, everybody, must keep (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: modelling rubber belts
|
| (...) It's a good ideia ! It's also a good escuse for you to learn part creation and help things get better and better. You are in need of them, so you are the most motivated person we could have. ;) Also an enlightened person once said: "Need, is (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: ?
|
| that link is dead now. Someone mind telling me what it was? I'm curious as to whats got the comunity in an uproar. Gary Richard Noeckel <Shroud_of_kung_fu@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GrtDzC.L11@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: *^$%$()^%^$ Missing Link to "New MOCs"
|
| (...) Yay! Another Bionicle Mech builder out there! That makes 3 1/2 (Bryce is the 1/2). Looks cool. Even though the Bohrok are small they have some pretty cool parts. My little crit of the MOC is that you should think about changing out the Bohrok (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: MLCAD vs LEOCAD
|
| (...) with it. (...) assembly. What do you mean with "exploded" ? Like all the parts separated by some distance, but shown in a way that you can menataly "implode" it to preview the actual model ? Did I explain my self correctly ? I don't know any (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-02, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Cool Link
|
| Found this today and thought I would share it. I am seriously tempted to try this just for fun. Check it out and enjoy. (URL) P. Miller (URL) (22 years ago, 22-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: link error with binutils 2.13
|
| Hi, (...) I'm running 3.1 and binutils 2.12.1. Did you have a 3.2 rpm-package? (...) You can get rid of these by making the #error string in config.h smaller. (...) Had the same problem with binutils 2.12.1-1. After a downgrade back to 2.12.1 all (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | fun link
|
| i found this while searching for lego ideas. quite humorous! (URL) new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* (URL) (22 years ago, 19-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.us.indylug)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
