|
| | Re: lugnet website dead?
|
| (...) He meant the LEGO Fan page:-) - but I have been meaning to get this done...and it's linked to the updated sidebar. Now working on some listings - kinda pointless to have just a blurb on the issues.... Joe (19 years ago, 19-Mar-06, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal)
| |
| dead (score: 0.895) |
|
|
| dead (score: 0.895) |
|
|
| dead (score: 0.895) |
|
| | Re: Train Motor dilema
|
| (...) Anthony- I've reported on this same subject before. The fundamental problem, viewed from the top level, is that LEGO train motor assemblies are not reliable and behavior can deteriorate rapidly and randomly according to usage, load, and luck. (...) (19 years ago, 9-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| |
| dead (score: 0.895) |
|
| | Re: lugnet website dead?
|
| (...) something the curator of the page controls, not LUGNET admins. See (URL) curator is Joe Meno. He may have forgotten to update the page carrying the information. Why not write him about it? Or maybe you're talking about the front page, in that (...) (19 years ago, 18-Mar-06, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal)
| |
| dead (score: 0.895) |
|
| | Re: lugnet website dead?
|
| (...) Nice page. Now link it from the sidebar of lugnet.publish.brickjournal (which you're the curator of unless I was reading things wrong) and you'll be all set! I think that was what the original poster was asking for. I could be wrong though. (...) (19 years ago, 19-Mar-06, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal)
| |
| dead (score: 0.895) |
|
|
| dead (score: 0.895) |
|
| | Re: On not hearing from LEGO (Was: So, who IS in the MDP?)
|
| (...) I personally know 9 people, with 7 different mail providers (this includes myself) who applied, received the initial confirmation, but never got a happy or sad confirmation email. I don't get very much spam so I employ the 'ol manual (...) (19 years ago, 11-Mar-06, to lugnet.lego)
| |
| dead (score: 0.895) |
|
| | Re: Word to the Reverend
|
| I particularly like the use of these technic girders here: (URL) This shot probably should have been none with less illumination, since no source of illumination is apparent, and you'd have to presume it was sunlight coming down from the hatch (...) (19 years ago, 18-Mar-06, to lugnet.build, FTX)
| |
| dead (score: 0.894) |
|
|
| dead (score: 0.893) |
|
|
| dead (score: 0.893) |
|
|
| dead (score: 0.893) |
|
|
| dead (score: 0.893) |
|
|
| dead (score: 0.893) |
|
|
| dead (score: 0.893) |
|
|
| dead (score: 0.892) |
|
|
| dead (score: 0.892) |
|
| | Re: 9v Train status report.
|
| (...) SNIP (...) I'd be a lot less worried if I knew Jake was still working for TLG. It may be my imagination but it seems like every SAH-exclusive/LEGO-Direct 9V train-related product that was produced in the last 5-6 years has had Jake's (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| |
| dead (score: 0.892) |
|
| | Re: 9v Train status report.
|
| (...) Are you sure that you or any fan can influence the decisions already made by LEGO? Another view on this whole "See what the fall sales bring and Lego will decide further" story is: Lego moves the sale of metal rails and stuff to S@H, because (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains)
| |
| dead (score: 0.892) |
|
| | Save 9v Trains
|
| I have to say that I'm really depressed by the defeatest attitude surrounding Eric Kingsley's post about trying to save 9v trains. Someone who actually has the ability to give our feedback to Lego has stepped up, given us what information he has, (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains)
| |
| dead (score: 0.891) |