|
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) I believe 'sodomite' is an accurate term, and the way I used it was not to bash anyone. You neglected to show the context in which I used that word in the first place, which was to show that by the term 'sodomite' one would know both 'sexual (...) (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, FTX)
| |
| dead (score: 0.454) |
|
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) There is a technically accurate term for describing a male heterosexual who has kids--a term that isn't used in 'polite company' (though appears in many rap songs and movies that love to use profanity...)--I don't think Lee would like people (...) (20 years ago, 12-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| dead (score: 0.454) |
|
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) Sure it is. And so is "bastard" and "moron" - but these terms have been deemed offensive, and so using them, even if accurate to do so, is considered offensive and rude. I should also point that 'sodomite' is not actually accurate, because it (...) (20 years ago, 12-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| dead (score: 0.454) |
|
|
| legends (score: 0.454) |
|
|
| dead (score: 0.454) |
|
| | Re: Trains arrive at Target in SoCal
|
| (...) And - as I just noticed by chance - we have today october the 1st. Which is a date exactely a half year after april 1st. Or may one say: right in the middle between two April Fools days. Hmmm... - And why has the number 4534 not mentioned (...) (22 years ago, 1-Oct-02, to lugnet.market.shopping)
| |
| beneke (score: 0.454) |
|
| | speaking of dead in the water...
|
| Hey I finally got around to setting up my account at brickshelf. Can anyone guess the gay icon movie that I have represented in this MOC? Being a filmmaker and therefore narcissistic I have put myself into the main character's, uh, role. The Chinese (...) (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
| |
| dead (score: 0.454) |
|
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) I know I didn't read ALL of the postings for the prior discussion, so I may have missed the ones Saskia is saying she was bashed in, but of the ones I did read, I didn't see anyone 'gay bashing', using crude/derogatory slangs at anyone else. (...) (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
| |
| dead (score: 0.454) |
|
| | time to get what we want
|
| I have been hearing you guys write about We want minifigs castles army boosters bla bla bla. Well then do something about it write lego a letter. trust me they read them. I sent them a letter to produce savas MOCS and they replied they said no but (...) (22 years ago, 30-Aug-02, to lugnet.castle)
| |
| legends (score: 0.454) |
|
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| This doesn't make any sense to me. It's like Monty Pythons "Life of Brian" when they talk about fighting for the right for men to have babies even though they can't physically have them. It would be like fighting for the legal right to marry and (...) (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
| |
| dead (score: 0.454) |
|
|
| beneke (score: 0.454) |
|
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) (URL) "Come on, before the modern term of 'homosexual' was coined into English, everyone knew what a sodomite was..." 'Sodomite', in case you didn't know, is considered offensive and an insult. Even if this term wasn't used against someone, it (...) (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, FTX)
| |
| dead (score: 0.454) |
|
|
| beneke (score: 0.454) |
|
|
| beneke (score: 0.454) |
|
|
| beneke (score: 0.454) |
|
| | Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| o.k......Now what? We have our group site that we fought tooth and nail for and now it sits for days on end without any new postngs. The same can be said for all of the other new people groups too. Are we going to progress and come up with a theme (...) (20 years ago, 10-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
| |
| dead (score: 0.454) |
|
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) Agreed. It is also inaccurate in that (at least in my view, which may be flawed because I'm hetero) having a preference and acting on that preference are not at all the same thing. (and the distinction goes a lot deeper than that) However I (...) (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, FTX)
| |
| dead (score: 0.454) |
|
|
| dead (score: 0.454) |
|
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| Steve DeCraemer wrote in message ... (...) for and now it sits for days on end without any new postngs. Personally, I am too busy fighting tooth and nail to make a house deal work to have much time for anything else. 'Course, I should have (...) (20 years ago, 10-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
| |
| dead (score: 0.454) |
|
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| Hello! (...) Maybe that's a good sign. This group was founded for those who felt uncomfortable posting certain things in the "normal" Lugnet newsgroups. So when nobody is posting to .lgbt it possibly means there is - currently - nobody feeling (...) (20 years ago, 10-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
| |
| dead (score: 0.454) |