LUGNET News : Search Results: dead legends Beneke


Search Results: dead legends Beneke

Results 1481 – 1500 of about 6600.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
(...) > (...) Type "7 words" into google and hit I'm Feeling Lucky. Google knows what I'm talking about. Google knows all. (...) This seems to lead to: -people like me feeling nothing is being done -people like Chris feeling they are being abused (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
(...) I think having a public record of timeouts is important - not only it allows the users (that you guys are serving, right?) keep an eye on how well you're doing your job, but it also shows that _something_ is getting done, and can be used to (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
(...) At the ever increasing rate I see the 7 words get used around here (Lugnet in general, rtlT has been clean) I'm surprised to hear that anyone has gotten banned. If something that obvious doesn't get you a time out I don't know what does. Well (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
(...) oh really? HOW many people so FAR have been given a time out? ~I~ dont know. other than the people involved and the "banisher" anyone keeping score? SO FAR, all i have is a line or two from admins SAYING they have "handed out WAY too many" and (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
(...) I don't think they'd really do that... (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
(...) Dave are you ready for this..... I just was sent an e-mail warning me that this VERY discussion we are haveing ~COULD~ get me banned! NOW to be fair. this person was NOT an admin (rather someone in the know) but I have no reason to disbelive (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
(...) DAVE, For such a smart and NICE guy, I cant belive you dont "get this." I do not deny that "I dared" something to happen. !~BUT~! thats NOT a valid reason to abuse a trust. As I have said before, where does this kind of thing end? if I can be (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote: FOr example, if you were (...) Mister David Geoffrey Koudys (in my strictest teacher voice) leave my cleavage out of this discussion! Thank you very much! Trust me, a punishment from me will be worse (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		Re: Legends highlight page...
Hi. I've updated the Legends page with some of the suggestions...ahem...Lar and Dave Eaton. See if you like it, and add any additional comments or gripes, etc. Previous comments are below: (...) Thanks Lar, I had each of them linked to pictures. (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)

legends
(score: 0.467)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
(...) You've spent too much time dealing with NDAs. Seriously, did you agree to not discuss whether or not, in general terms, timeouts had been handed down? No, wait -- you wouldn't be able to discuss whether you agreed to not discuss it. Sheesh. (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Kelly McKiernan wrote: <snip> (...) See!!!! Seriously, people better start realizing that LUGNET, but most especially, rtlT, is a really cool place to hang out. And again, I reiterate--what happened in o-t.foo should (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote: <snip> (...) Oh look! I can still post! For crying out loud! It was off-topic.foo!!!!! If you want to get your knickers in a knot over something, try guys who spill ice tea on people's laps at (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
(...) Great Googley Moogley!!! Hey Chris! I have an Idea--why don't you go join Ken and Richard 'Ben' who also have inordinately large chips on their shoulders and you guys can form a club for those people who are pissed about the inconsequential (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) I have an issue with two things--one--if it's a "Psst Chris--don't talk about it or you'll get banned" thing then I wouldn't listen, and since I've received no such e-mail (and I'm the (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) And whereas I agree that the potential is there, I do not usually fall for the 'slippery slope' situation--if we're having a good time in o.t.foo and someone locks out your account in the (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
(...) No I didn't. In fact I already said elsewhere that some had. And, it's causing some very unfortunate confusion: (URL) ... someone has made an invalid assumption there, and forgotten that we don't censor, we can only request cancels which users (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
(...) I know which ones you mean too. But I'll say that I personally don't like the milder ones either, I think they show lack of imagination. I am in the minority on the Admin team, so A-- gets a pass and B---- seems to fit the sitch, and S--- gets (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
(...) It depends on which 7 words you mean. I have seen a number of words used here in rtlT that I personally do think are inappropriate. (...) It is not the current policy to comment on who has or hasn't been given a timeout (a timeout is different (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
(...) - snip - (...) Chris, To my knowledge, this portion of the discussion is not a problem, and I don't believe there has been anything called out that you or Dave have written to cause a timeout. (Although the language is starting to get tinged (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.467)

		Re: Ist ja bald wieder soweit - Xmas 2002. // War: Na, Blaubärte - schöne Weihnachten gehabt?
(...) Ok, ich schäme mich schon. Da aber kaum noch Kollegen hier sind, mit denen man Mittags moorhühner schießen könnte, oder nur einfach etwas sabbeln, kompensiere ich das mit Lugnet. Ich denke, wenn ich fast jeden Tag von vor 7:00 bis nach 21:00 (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.loc.de)

beneke
(score: 0.467)

More: Next Page >>