rtlToronto : 13058

Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 13058

13057 | 13059

Subject:	Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date:	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:01:48 GMT
Viewed:	5703 times

In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote: > It is not the current policy to comment on who has or hasn't been given a > timeout (a timeout is different than being banned, I note) so if you have > concluded that no one has gotten any timeouts, you may not necessarily be > correct. You've spent too much time dealing with NDAs. Seriously, did you agree to not discuss whether or not, in general terms, timeouts had been handed down? No, wait -- you wouldn't be able to discuss whether you agreed to not discuss it. Sheesh. Steve

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
(...) No I didn't. In fact I already said elsewhere that some had. And, it's causing some very unfortunate confusion: (URL) ... someone has made an invalid assumption there, and forgotten that we don't censor, we can only request cancels which users (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
(...) It depends on which 7 words you mean. I have seen a number of words used here in rtlT that I personally do think are inappropriate. (...) It is not the current policy to comment on who has or hasn't been given a timeout (a timeout is different (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

103 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact