rtlToronto : 13044

Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 13044

13043 | 13045

Subject:	Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date:	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:35:03 GMT
Viewed:	5001 times

In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote: > In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: > > <snip> > > > HEY (ADMIN), I "double dare" you to cancle EVERY POST I have ever written since > > day one. > > > > then what dave? sure 90% of my stuff goes away, but what about the 10% of > > USEFUL stuff that was actually good. > > > > Prove to me that the "system" has checks and balances to prevent that abuse. > > > > my point. IT DOSEN'T > > > > ----------------end example------------ > > > > > > I hope today is slow casue I want to do this all day! > > > > :) > > > > Chris > > And whereas I agree that the potential is there, I do not usually fall for the > 'slippery slope' situation--if we're having a good time in o.t.foo and someone > locks out your account in the spirit of 'good fun' (and it really really was > 'cause I laughed, therefore, as the colour issue people state, if I believe it, > everyone must believe it and therefore it must be true and indisputable!!) then > the 'checks and balances' of the system do not apply. FOr example, if you were > in rtlT and you 'double dared' an admin to do it, even if Janey sent the admin a > pic of her cleavage (whether she did or didn't last time, I'll not presume ;) ) > it wouldn't have happened. > > Much like the Fight Club--what happens in the Fight Club, stays in teh Fight > Club--you broke rule number 1! > > Dave K Dave are you ready for this..... I just was sent an e-mail warning me that this VERY discussion we are haveing ~COULD~ get me banned! NOW to be fair. this person was NOT an admin (rather someone in the know) but I have no reason to disbelive this person. For obvious reasons I wont e-mail and "tell." So dave. splain me THAT! I will re-reply to your mesage again. BUT I thought I'd put this out as an FYI. Chris

Message has 3 Replies:

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
(...) I don't think they'd really do that... (22 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) I have an issue with two things--one--if it's a "Psst Chris--don't talk about it or you'll get banned" thing then I wouldn't listen, and since I've received no such e-mail (and I'm the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
(...) - snip - (...) Chris, To my knowledge, this portion of the discussion is not a problem, and I don't believe there has been anything called out that you or Dave have written to cause a timeout. (Although the language is starting to get tinged (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) And whereas I agree that the potential is there, I do not usually fall for the 'slippery slope' situation--if we're having a good time in o.t.foo and someone locks out your account in the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

103 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact