To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: america.lego.com
 Results 1941 – 1960 of about 412000.
Search took 0.05 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Ancient Greece
 
(...) (URL) at the bottom. -JHK (22 years ago, 28-Jul-02, to lugnet.adventurers)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.170)

  Re: Lego New is Up
 
(...) And I get the IE5 default 404 "page not found" with this one. Steve (24 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: What´s new at www.lego.com ?
 
Was I blind ? Boba Fett ! I hope you´re right. Now I can´t sleep ... ;) I try and move this to starwars... dö (...) noticed ? (...) (25 years ago, 14-Oct-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: What´s new at www.lego.com ?
 
Actually, I was thinking the same thing... -Andy Lynch Kevin Loch wrote in message ... (...) noticed (...) (25 years ago, 14-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: What´s new at www.lego.com ?
 
(...) What do you mean, "enhancement"? You mean you enlarged the image? You don't gain any more information that way -- if anything, you lose meaningful data as your software makes up pixels to smooth things out. (25 years ago, 14-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: What´s new at www.lego.com ?
 
(...) Easier to see in the sense that the computer has provided data to make it look better bigger, so it's all nice and smooth and all, but not easier to see in any sense that cares about what's actually in the image! (25 years ago, 14-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: What´s new at www.lego.com ?
 
(...) :-) (...) to (...) Did you try and hit reload after you got to the page? I'm far from a computer geek, so that's a total guess :-) Julie (...) (25 years ago, 15-Oct-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: What´s new at www.lego.com ?
 
(...) Yep. Overproduced... underengineered, and definitely undertested. That's what you get for letting creative do your web site design. Creative needs to be a resource to the techies that actually make things work or you get high sizzle and no (...) (25 years ago, 16-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look)
 
(...) That's the direction I'm coming at this from. Denominator, in its non-math sense, means "that which gives a name to something". Applied to the topic at hand, that very logically means what sorts of documents the browser is said to understand. (...) (25 years ago, 17-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look)
 
Matthew: It is refreshing to see your pedantry and stubbornness so openly on display. I don't feel quite so alone! And as for correcting what arguably is an egregious error(1), I'm not done using my lance yet, you'll have to wait your turn. In the (...) (25 years ago, 17-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look)
 
(...) I'm not sure that makes sense. By definition, all things that are in common occur the same amount -- i.e. everywhere. 'Cause otherwise, it wouldn't be common. Another possible alternative phrase might be "broadest common denominator"... (25 years ago, 17-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look)
 
(...) Uh, I think that'd be "inconsistency in my bookmark file". For a while, we were pedantic about the something-can't-be-b...d-a-domain rule, but then we decided to give in to the New World Order of web/dns. *grin* (25 years ago, 17-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look)
 
(...) Yeah, maybe I'll stop now. :) (25 years ago, 17-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: What´s new at www.lego.com ?
 
Distinguish "technical" from "technogeek" ? I'd argue that technogeek is NOT needed unless geeks are your audience, and even then, they appreciate speed and simplicity too. (25 years ago, 18-Oct-99, to lugnet.publish)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: What´s new at www.lego.com ?
 
I won't respond point by point but I will say this, a good designer has to have both creative and cognitive skills. Many bad designers have only creative skills, the way I (and CTP) define them. Understanding things like color theory, psychology, (...) (25 years ago, 18-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: 2000 pictures found on www,lego.com! (Again)
 
These are on the OFFICIAL website? why is this wrong? I can access them from their MENU.. not from digging around. I have to say.. I'm getting a little tired of the power hunger around here.. what are we supposed to do? sit on our damn hands and not (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: New sets, pictures at lego.com
 
(...) Just throw in set #4930 for some dwarves. ;) (...) The light-pink fairy in #5823 also has the moon pattern. Can someone tell me *why* they didn't use minifigs for the fairies? These non-poseable SPUDs are terrible! (...) And this fairy has a (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: Yellow Supercar on Lego.com
 
(...) I think it was probably a mistake. I wouldn't expect them to do this knowingly. BTW, I liked the middle car best. Fredrik (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: Service Catalog gone from lego.com
 
Yeah, it does sound kinda hokey. The years 1985 thru 1989 were kind of a blur...... (long term memory loss).... I should have proofread what I wrote. Gary Istok (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

  Re: Service Catalog gone from lego.com
 
"KM" == Kevin Maynes <ERASETHISBITkmaynes...surfr.com> writes: KM> Hey.. instead of cleaning out the old ABS then loading the new, KM> maybe let the old ABS run nearly out, then load the new right on KM> top. Theoretically (just a theory.. I don't (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
 

lego, com
(score: 4.169)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR