|
| | Re: LP POINT 1
|
| "Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:G4p2uy.KL2@lugnet.com... (...) who were (...) America's (...) neo-Victorian (...) Oregon (...) one, (...) the one (...) me what (...) the (...) populace (...) not (...) hit (...) seems (...) (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, property (score: 2.455) |
|
| | Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...
|
| (...) Given this bit of (rather unsurprising) information, is there any chance of enforcing something in the ToS to make this person go away? If not, is there any chance of adding something to the ToS to make it easier to make people like this go (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
| all, rights (score: 2.455) |
|
| | Re: Are we all too nice?
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Todd Lehman writes: [snippage throughout] (...) No. There is no such thing. Eric Kingsley took this completely in the direction of constructive criticism toward creative works. And he's right that the only valuable (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 2.455) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.454) |
|
| | IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
|
| (...) Can you check that for a possible missing word? I read it a few times and haven't grokked it yet. Thanks! Maybe it's a UK turn of phrase? "voice decent at"?? (...) I'll give it a brief once over later today... you already know what I'm going (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, property (score: 2.454) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.454) |
|
| | The day after disaster
|
| (...) Standing by your principals is commendable. If you concur with those principals, then you absolutely should vote for him. (...) Yes - the three "old-line" parties are various versions of the same thing. (...) Have you actually READ the (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, property (score: 2.454) |
|
| | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Well that definitely wasn't nice if thats how it happened. *But* how much damage do you think he could have done to us from his site? From a technical standpoint his site is nice but not something that is going to generate a ton of hits on its (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| all, rights (score: 2.454) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.453) |
|
| | Re: IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
|
| (...) It is because I'm getting bored with your dislike of democracy. Bored. After I read your last post I remembered this point: "Democracy is just an euphemism for mob rule, where two lions and a sheep vote on the dinner, and there should instead (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, property (score: 2.453) |
|
| | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) People seem to be suggesting, though, that one should not choose to voice that opinion. If person A can voice an opinion that persons B, C, and D find offensive (and to be honest - persons E, F, and G couldn't care less about) I'd say B, C, or (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| all, rights (score: 2.453) |
|
| | Re: Critical Thinking
|
| (...) Larry - your vehemous defence of asking to be left alone is admirable indeed. And you are certainly correct in that you are facing the consequences of your actions - I will actually support your doing so. But I would ask you this - If you knew (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, property (score: 2.453) |
|
| | Re: Critical Thinking
|
| (...) Larry - your vehemous defence of asking to be left alone is admirable indeed. And you are certainly correct in that you are facing the consequences of your actions - I will actually support your doing so. But I would ask you this - If you knew (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, property (score: 2.453) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.452) |
|
| | Re: All The Money In The World
|
| (...) Yes it includes the time, but that money order you've got in your hand is simply "valued at" property. The money order itself is not actual money. One might say, however that you've increased the amount of VALUE in the town temporarily, but (...) (24 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
| all, property (score: 2.452) |
|
| | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) Well, James, we've already had this argument. You know darn well already that all of these things above are goods, rather than rights. And as I've said before, there is no moral right to free goods. But since you're a communist: (URL) not sure (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 2.451) |
|
| | Re: Is space property?
|
| (...) [snip] (...) Short answer NO. Long answer: However Space-Time can be a form of limited property, and *must* be so!!! This is due to the reality of SPACE. When people think of space they are woofully ignorant as to what they are refering to. A (...) (24 years ago, 26-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, property (score: 2.451) |
|
| | Re: Gear spacings.
|
| (...) Well, I think this is something you could divide into two parts: STEP 1: Find all combination of gears that'll produce a gear ratio within some user-specified range using less than some specified number of gear wheels. That's a simple problem (...) (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
| all, rights (score: 2.451) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.451) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.451) |