 | | Re: Enough already
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:385ce0d5.267874...net.com... (...) <snip> (...) with (...) respect (...) <snip> (...) Larry (...) there's a (...) LEGO (...) sense (...) mouths (...) What are you trying to say? Don't you think (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
|
A fair policy. Thank you for clearing it up. I was concerned that Lego corp would shut down any scans. It is good to know that Lego not only talks end users support but also walks the walk. Thanks from a very grate full user. Jeffey Baldwin User (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Droid Developer Kit and RCX ???
|
|
(...) I modified the original R2-D2 model to use the Scout. As the Scout is just the same size of th RCX, you might want to have a look at my creature. You can find it at the Italian Lego Users Group site (URL) worry, text in English). The site uses (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Cross posting in eu (was: Aaargh!)
|
|
(...) software (...) I agree. Look at this experiment (babelfish): Your original sentence: "I'd rather not.. Translation software is kind of icky in general, and copyright issues I think would make automated translation a rather expensive (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.eu)
|
| |
| | Re: Sigh......
|
|
(...) Are you surprised? 15% off $too.expensive is still too much for me to pay, particularly when I can get them from the US shipped here for free (via my brother). I'm hoping to get a truckload of these new sets when he's out in Feb (along with (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
|
