 | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc)
|
|
(...) This is a good point. I do find the "holier than though" attitude of some posters (and not just in this thread/topic/group) to be a bit much. Scott A (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Resubmission of: Trailer on Flatcar (TOFC) [DAT]
|
|
Whoops! Error in my in the final .DAT file. It is corrected in this copy. I elected to change the trailer's final color. In case it shows up hollow, #391 is a mixture of the two grays. (...) Each of these are separate models/subparts. Treat them as (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc)
|
|
G. Benedikt Rochow wrote in message ... (...) <snip>> (...) Humm... I don't recall trying to pull the wool over anyone's eyes or trying to take any unfair advantage. Come to think of it, I didn't even create their error. If you think I did please (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Authoring
|
|
(...) I don't think you're missing anything obvious. The LDAO editors look at two sections in ldraw.ini for which views to include in that dropdown, [Views] and [View Moves]. A view has to be defined in both sections. [Views] gives the viewing angle (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: S@H said "not yet- wait 'till January"
|
|
(...) As of today there has been no change in status of the sets in the TRU computer, they are not at the warehouse yet. -chris (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: S@H said "not yet- wait 'till January"
|
|
(...) Just an update- I called again today since the rumours are saying the new sets are so close to coming out. They now have the item numbers in the computer, but no other info. Still saying probably not 'till January. Oh well- I'll start bugging (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Toyshop problem?
|
|
(...) I just wish I could give that 10% discount to someone who could use it. Shipping is too much for it to be worthwhile to me. While I am disappointed I won't be getting the items I ordered, I'm glad they aren't gonna bankrupt themselves trying (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: ordinery vs. action minifigs
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message ... (...) Yes - the peasant torso had already been around for years, used in both the peasants and in some of the forestmen (with the torso in green). (Then, the torso made a reappearance in Dark Forest, but slightly (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | RE: Any ideas on how to do this with Technic?
|
|
If you want to vary the rate at which an object of constant weight moves, why not use a mechanism like an old postal scale. No, not the kind that shoots you when you look at it sideways... It involves a pendulum mounted so that when the object is at (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Jumping 'bots?
|
|
Funny that this thread should come up again today- I saw on the Early Show this morning these cool remote controlled two-legged bots that stood up by themselves and balanced using a gyro-scope. A one legged hopper could probably balance this way, (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
