 | | Re: I've just overhauled my Lego Website.
|
|
(...) I chuckled when I saw that too. Touché Scott! :) The 'premier' bit wasn't intended as a dig, in fact I had clean forgotten about Scott's site, hence the 'Scotland's only website' bit. (though I admit I half expected to be challenged on that (...) (27 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Star Wars LEGOs
|
|
I'm looking for some Star Wars LEGO "give aways". These aren't really promos about I'm hoping someone here can help me. Please let me know if you have any Star Wars LEGO sets that aren't avalible in stores, I have the Denver Celabration brick. There (...) (27 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.promo)
|
| |
| | Re: Indranil
|
|
(...) And nothing else. Your postings come from a hotmail account, I didn't see a roll call entry and you haven't mentioned whether you have a website. Whereas I am rather well known in the community and a lot of info about me is available if you (...) (27 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Track names (was Re: To Tore Eriksson)
|
|
(...) You could not find it with that loose and sloppy description! :-) (URL) Sorry about that! (...) You're right, slots are a better name than notches for the openings. However I would say that "tabs" are a better name for the part on the sleeper (...) (27 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: What set(s) is this piece found in?
|
|
(...) at both ends but is a straight cylindrical part, (very common) or the piece that connects to IT which only has one and is two rods with the ends bent down. if the latter, that is a pantgraph shoe. See this page: (URL) particularly the terms (...) (27 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
