 | | Re: Lugnet Newsgroups Anniversary!
|
|
(...) Happy birthday, LUGNET! You are far more coherent than I was at one year old! :-, (...) It has far exceeded my expectations. Accessing RTL was hard for me -- our news server at work wouldn't send messages I posted to any other news server. (...) (27 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Track names (was Re: To Tore Eriksson)
|
|
(...) I'm curious Chris, in what sets was that the case ? And do these gray ones have those "negative" tapered ends, just like the old blue track had ? In lugnet.cad.dev, Larry Pieniazek writes: (...) Gimme a set number for "the wildwest miningish" (...) (27 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: FS : Mars promo sets
|
|
Due to ingorance of the metric system, these candies will melt in your hands and not in your mouth... (URL) to .off-topic.fun Matthew Miller <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrn7vhi1s.s9g.....bu.edu... (...) You're not alone. (27 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Standardized Inventory File Format?
|
|
(...) Hmm, interesting. Are there any XML writers, to convert flat-ASCII to flat-XML? Steve (27 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Comprehensive meta-command list
|
|
(...) Yes, they do. In the example above, the first meta-command, 0 TRANSLATE 20 0 0, would persist until the end of the file. (...) I think I know the answer to this question, but just to be sure: is the 0 INVERT meta-command transparent to (...) (27 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: CW/CCW, vertex sequence, co-planar, convex, (115kB)
|
|
(...) I've been thinking the exact opposite -- mirroring should be a valid method for turning subfiles inside-out, and the software doesn't need to do anything special to deal with it (except to notice the inversion, and pass that info on to the (...) (27 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Interpreting the proposed FACE meta-command
|
|
(...) Why not recognize it all ways: 0 FACE ACW 0 FACE ANTICLOCKWISE 0 FACE CCW 0 FACE CLOCKWISE 0 FACE COUNTERCLOCKWISE 0 FACE CW 0 FACE DOUBLESIDED 0 FACE DS 0 FACE UNKNOWN This adds a bit to the parser, but not so much. The recommended standard (...) (27 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
|
|
(...) No (like Gary said). Two reasons: 1. The 0 FACE directive would be an operative switch, not a global setting. This is convenient, but it is also necessary in some cases. Most importantly, it would allow the 0 FACE meta-statement to appear (...) (27 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
|
|
(...) That's what we're doing now--figuring out what the standard should be. Both the function and the syntax. But "standard" is an odd term in this case. In my mind the LDraw standard is defined as "code which is recognized and interpreted by (...) (27 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
|
|
(...) Neither do I, but I also know how hard it is to visually check a part for errors. (...) How does that work? Is it based on what the majority of the rays deterimine? I probably need to re-read some of the messages in this thread, to get a (...) (27 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
