| | egcs-1.1.1 patch, legOS projects structure
|
|
Hi, this night is proving productive. I went ahead and tweaked egcs to produce RCX-specific interrupt handler prologues and epilogues. Apply this patch against egcs-1.1.1/gcc/confi...0/h8300.c, and you will be able to create interrupt handlers the (...) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: CW/CCW, vertex sequence, co-planar, convex, (115kB)
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <37f4edd7.8510607@lu...et.com>... (...) are (...) rotated (...) thinking. (...) Possibly. I'm not to great when it comes to expressing myself. I think if an even number of mirror operations are performed on a part, its (...) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Does anyone else think outback was modeled on the australian bush?
|
|
(...) I am building a lego shearer and mabie a shearing shed to go with him. All I need is a good design for a lego sheep. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.town)
|
|
| | Re: Modern Police Department
|
|
Good design but datsville already has a police force, mine. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
|
| | Re: CW/CCW, vertex sequence, co-planar, convex, (115kB)
|
|
(...) OIC now. I think. If an asymmetrical part is mirrored, it keeps the same shape, but is turned inside out. To get it right-side-out again, it must be re-mirrored. In other words, there's no way to produce left- and right-handed pairs of (...) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: CW/CCW, vertex sequence, co-planar, convex, (115kB)
|
|
(...) Jacob: (...) Why? Having a negative determinate *should* turn subfiles inside-out. IMO. That's a useful function. Having programs checking determinates is not useful, and wastes rendering time. Steve (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
|
|
(...) We're it. So to speak. Steve (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files [DAT]
|
|
(...) 578 is compliant because it contains *only* subfile references, which have been verified to not mess up (C)CW-ness. But that doesn't mean the *subfiles* are compliant. It also assumes the compliant subfiles are oriented the way the author (me) (...) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: tiny gears
|
|
(...) (URL) ___...___ Jonathan Pennington | -Wannabe Geologist/Anthropologist Charleston, SC | -Linux User and Advocate Email at jwp(at)awod.com | 83 V45 Magna "The Lighter Side" root@localhost (Spambot food) | 71 Triumph TR6C "Mistake" ---...--- (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
|
| | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <37f6c0d9.269680202@...et.com>... (...) Doh, you posted mere minutes before me and said the same thing. :) -Gary (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
|
|
Jean-Pierre PARIS wrote in message <37F660FB.1EC77AC9@w...doo.fr>... (...) I see where you're coming from now. You're right. (...) could (...) It's starting to sound like user intervention would be needed in most, if not all, cases. Maybe it would (...) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
|
|
(...) This isn't automatic, but what if the program interrogates the user to pick a side which is facing outward? From that information, the program could then mark-up all adjacent sides. If the program ran out of sides, it could re-interrogate for (...) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | A couple of new little sets...
|
|
Hello all, I was in my local grocery store (in NC) and spotted some small Lego sets. They were number 1068 and 1070. One is a plane and the other a helicopter. They have Extream Team logos on them as well, but he minifigs are plain. They cost $3 and (...) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | NGLTC early pics from Greenbery Show
|
|
Hey the show is going great, the larger layout has made life so much easier. Here are a few early pictures from todays show, later this week I'll have some more overview pics and such. (URL) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
|
| | Re: Download problem
|
|
(...) Mario, I just loaded it 6 times in a row without a single error... How? I'm scared but I have to say it... I tried to load the program in Windows 95. There must be something in NT that is preventing to load big programs. I tried to check the (...) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
| | Re: Download problem
|
|
(...) Mario, I just loaded it 6 times in a row without a single error... How? I'm scared but I have to say it... I tried to load the program in Windows 95. There must be something in NT that is preventing to load big programs. I tried to check the (...) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
| | Re: fast firmware downloader - and compilers
|
|
(...) Not at all ;-) fast.srec works like this: - load new image, storing it immediately behind fast.srec - fix stack pointer, you'll start new firmware anyways - relocate a small routine immediately below SP - call that routine - relocate the (...) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Miniland
|
|
On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Liam Parnell (<Pine.LNX.4.04.9910....30612-100 000@ukonline.co.uk>) wrote at 23:18:20 (...) It's here: (URL);-P (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
|
| | More Southern Legofest pics
|
|
Ooh. My brain hurts. Well, I've finally sorted something out. Hope you like it. (URL) Tony Priestman (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
|
| | RE: fast firmware downloader - and compilers
|
|
I'll have to try fastdl at some point. My pbFORTH image is assembled to live at 0x8000 and be loaded just like "real" firmware. If I use fastdl, how do I have to change my firmware assembly output to accomodate it? On the subject of configurable (...) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|