 | | Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
|
|
(...) After searching Peeron and BrickLink, I think that this is not a real LEGO part. There are more of them in Datsville. (...) If it is an existing LEGO part (which I tend to doubt), the .dat file may not have been submitted to the Tracker. Those (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | [FreeLUG : French Enthusiast LEGO(c) User Group] Les nouveautés dimanche 22 novembre 2009
|
|
Bonjour Voici la lettre d'information du site "FreeLUG : French Enthusiast LEGO(c) User Group" ((URL) lettre recense les articles et les brèves publiés depuis 1 jours. Nouveaux articles ---...--- ** Le village Duplo de Jeanne ** par danielle (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.org.fr.freelug)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark
|
|
(...) That's an interesting question to ponder. When LEGO-scale Mega Bloks came onto the scene, they filled a gap that LEGO had left open. Namely, MB produced simple sets with large quantities of basic elements in unusual colors, such as military (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark
|
|
(...) Happens now and again. As I recall, toy vehicles that transformed into robots were marketed in the USA with almost no success, but Hasbro took the idea, attached a story line to it, and an animated show, and it took off like wildfire. I expect (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LSynth 3.1 Released ***
|
|
(...) default was "(Default)", instead of LSynth or something similar. I'm not sure if it matters, but this was in Windows 7. --Travis (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Message from Doug Bell regarding Electronic Thinking
|
|
Hi Everyone, It was great seeing all of you at the SMART meeting on Saturday. One of the things that came up at the meeting was Doug Bell's new involvement in the company Electronic Thinking. Doug asked me to forward the message below about some (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.org.us.smart, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
|
(...) Sorry. I just reread that and it's full of grammar mistakes. Mike (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
|
|
(...) Is it an official part? Why isn't it included with the official distribution? Mike (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
|
|
(...) I've checked this out now, and you can't replace 606p01b.dat with 606p01.dat. It will not come out with the same colors, regardless which main color you use in the calling Type 1 line. /Tore (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
|
(...) Well, the main difference (I think) is that if someone modifies a LGPL or CC work and distributes it on the Internet or something, he or she must also allow other people to do the same with their modified version. There are also some (...) (15 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
