 | | Re: MacDonalds????
|
|
(...) And how much is this little guy?? Russell (27 years ago, 5-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
 | | Re: my house at home
|
|
(...) no, but..... i can make one hehhehehehhehehe the house i think..., after i submited it, isnt finished to some degree. it needs interior furnishings. but aaaah so what its the outside that counts (27 years ago, 5-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
 | | DT&LC rr
|
|
the railroad name is an iffie dat and lcad rr (d&lc?) a shortline rr is a good idea, not a big roadname.. ive seen a article in a model railroader mag a long time ago about a new england shortline railroad, and all it basically was is 2 engines and (...) (27 years ago, 5-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
 | | Re: my house at home
|
|
(...) Our first garage! Hope you have a vehicle or two to add to it. -John Van (27 years ago, 5-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
 | | Re: datsville monument
|
|
(...) monumental (...) torso?? thats in the parts updates. if need be put just a plain torso in there. but about the changes for the monument itself yes i can do. the thought of a 2 x 2 45 deg brick with a " J J " is also a posibility..? ok cool (...) (27 years ago, 5-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
 | | Re: LCadville
|
|
(...) How about going the extra step and making the 8-stud plates? -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (27 years ago, 5-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
 | | Re: fire torso & hat (was: Re: LCadville)
|
|
(...) Nope. I was pointing out that it was being done -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (27 years ago, 5-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
 | | Re: Datsville
|
|
(...) We should hold back on trains untill someone makes the curved track pieces. And yes trains can do hills. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (27 years ago, 5-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
 | | Re: Large wooden door
|
|
(...) It in in the current vote! -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (27 years ago, 5-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
 | | Re: decoding a message sent by an RCX
|
|
(...) I wondered about that - hardly any traffic in the newsgroup despite numerous downloads of NQC. I hope its because people are just too busy building stuff and programming it with NQC and RcxCC. Perhaps I should add a few more bugs to NQC just (...) (27 years ago, 5-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|