Subject:
|
Re: decoding a message sent by an RCX
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Sun, 5 Sep 1999 03:53:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1931 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <37D17850.7F67621C@skynet.be>, Philippe Jadin
<philippe.jadin@skynet.be> wrote:
> It seems that this NQC newsgroup is not
> very active, but that's probably because NQC is 99.999% bug free and so
> is RCXCC...
I wondered about that - hardly any traffic in the newsgroup despite
numerous downloads of NQC. I hope its because people are just too busy
building stuff and programming it with NQC and RcxCC.
Perhaps I should add a few more bugs to NQC just to make the discussion
more interesting. :)
Dave Baum
--
reply to: dbaum at enteract dot com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: decoding a message sent by an RCX
|
| Dave Baum wrote: [snip] (...) Better yet, make it generate the code that I want it to generate, not what I tell it to generate. Thanks for giving us all such a great language ... without NQC I most likely would have an RCX collecting dust. - Nick - (25 years ago, 5-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: decoding a message sent by an RCX
|
| Woaw ! This could be great to have a full featured rcx expansion board... It should however be not too expensive, and in my opinion very basic to allow anything to be made. A "simple" (hehe :-) 8 bit Input / Output expander would be very, very nice. (...) (25 years ago, 4-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
