 | | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) On the small logos it probably would not work, so another solution would have to be devised for that. (...) I'd prefer to keep it red. I don't think a wireframe fade would be considered under TLG's trade dress if a squabble arose. (...) I (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: FA : SOCCER SETS AND SUB-SETS (all new misp/misb)
|
|
(...) So am I...to a point...$40 for empty boxes...I'd start having my doubts. Unfortunately, I've been left hanging more than a few times by those with no feedback. Good luck to you. Julie He/she is (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) Well, if we were to contact TLG, what would be the best approach to it, to get on their good side? I'm not totally objected to contacting them, I just would like to make sure we've done everything we can to have them not jump on us beforehand. (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Box Progress
|
|
(...) The only reason I thought each box should have a received/log/mailed thread of its own was to help Tamy. I know she's back at school and I thought it would be less time consuming for her to check to see who wants to be added if we keep the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: FA : SOCCER SETS AND SUB-SETS (all new misp/misb)
|
|
Also for the record, Scott had appended his eBay posting to explicitly state the boxes are empty *before* anyone here pointed out the possibly misleading description. And Scott, sorry if my first contribution to this thread sounded accusatory - I (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
