 | | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
|
(...) A little - the next question of course is: Can NXT1 be both slave (to NXT0) and master (to NXT2, NXT3, NXT4) at the same time? Or does that require sneaky protocol to switch between the 2? ROSCO (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: My First few NXT MOCs
|
|
(...) Dave (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
|
(...) Dave, I don't know a whole lot about BT (beyond the little I've found out because of this project), but your assessment is correct. The protocol is implemented according to BT spec, so all communication is done through master-slave (...) (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
|
(...) Ok after actually reading the other threads in this post, it looks like TLG decided to develop its own BT profile just for the NXT. The messaging mechanism described by Brian and Steve looks like it will allow direct slave-slave communication, (...) (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
|
(...) Quite muddy! Why only three connections and what about specification adherence? Are they trying to limit its potential applications or were they just trying to get out a production-ready implementation? In other words are there plans for an (...) (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
|
(...) I can't speak for the NXT, but knowing that it has BT, and should be adhering to the specs, then the answer would be yes. The master-slave communication is coordinated via time slots within a piconet. This would avoid message collisions. In (...) (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
|
(...) That's one possibility. (...) OK, that's a much better way of phrasing that :). The thing that's a little confusing (to me) is that means that if the NXT named "Ann" wants to communicate with one named "Ben", you can establish a BT connection (...) (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Nuovi treni 9V
|
|
(...) No problem, that is what those images are for :) As for the site I am working on ways to make it even more international. As it stands members can choose their language and most of the "navigation links" will translate for you. I am also (...) (19 years ago, 3-May-06, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Is the novelty wearing out?
|
|
(...) Perhaps in some geographic areas with a long intense history... perhaps. But in general, I don't think so. For instance, at HoB last year (the first year they had any LEGO - it's really a SciFi/Fantasy convention), the people coming through (...) (19 years ago, 3-May-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Port types (Re: NXT to NXT communication?)
|
|
(...) Erm, can I clarify here; The digital sensor port which is part of the motor port is not the same as the digital port which is part of the main sensor ports. The two digital wires which are part of the motor port are input only, whereas the (...) (19 years ago, 3-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
