 | | FA - More SC items - BOATS!
|
|
OK, sports fans, as I promised... it's off to the boat races. Big time boats are here for you... for all of you that missed out on the recent boating action in the "500" auction, here you go. Every one of these is set well below what the same item (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: 6056 - Brick 2 x 2 x 6 with Groove
|
|
(...) The point of such a move would be to limit this kind of puzzlement for voters when new elements come out. It only needs to be a single set, and even a hint would help a lot in most cases ("from Star Wars sets", "gear from very old (1960's) (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 1857's, (remember those!), £7.85!!!!!!!!
|
|
Ha ha! OK - I'll concede you win that one. (As you can see, my generosity knows no bounds) <grin>. I use Tescos as my ISP - their mail server is not too bad but their web server is awful. That and the desire to minimize my phone bill by reading (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatic Switch
|
|
(...) two? I think there has been a few directory shuffles at the web site... very sorry about that. This is the index page of pictures of a few of my things. This should work... I have not been experienceing any problems. (URL) Victorian Lego Group (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: How much for a 6036?
|
|
Arjan Brugman wrote in message <01bee812$9e247f80$d...efault>... (...) <37B84944.3C697F@wor...tt.net>... (...) me! (...) to open it yet. (...) bids. (...) (as I told my (...) rid (...) aren't (...) do like the (...) people! (...) I probably have (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Give me strength...
|
|
Markassius wrote in message ... (...) You got the number right, Mark. That is a cool set - I got it in a large lot (of which I said I would sell the non-Castle sets) and still haven't been able to let it go. -- Have fun! John AUCTION Page (More (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
Be sure to include in your 8448 review: "...truly inspired by the 956, but built with the structural nuances of the 8480 Space Shuttle. Definately not another 8880, but strangely that's a plus." KL (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Question from a newbie
|
|
Hi Craig, Welcome and thanks for posting! Craig Livingston <CLivin007@aol.com> wrote in message news:FGL6HI.JpL@lugnet.com... (...) legos. (...) the (...) and (...) brick-naming (...) nomenclature (...) Yes you did come to the right place (I think (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: 8448 ramblings
|
|
Well, since I diddn't buy any 98 Technic sets, I guess that explains my ignorance. Of course I'm always wrong about new parts anyway :) KL (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
|
(...) Both l2p and l3p have their advantages depending on the goal of the user. l3p is great if you want a rendered version of a model, no matter the parts. l2p is great if you want a more detailed/smooth render and the parts are available. Thanks (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
