 | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) no. if your input is a hole 10 studs, By 10 bricks (just for arguments sake) and needs to be 5 bricks off the ground...then your input device can be ANY size smaller than that. you ONLY have to deliver a 2x4 maybe i wast clear on the input (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) Maybe Jennifer & Janey could enter it (official "J"Lug entry?). I'm sure it will outscore Chris. (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) Like that. I'd even go so far as to say the playfield should come with 1 box sitting somewhere in the middle to act as a "control" that performance can be measured against. -Rob A> (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) ... (...) ... (...) So, you want to defined the exact input area, which, pretty much defines the output. Can you also tell us where the wheels & motors go? Here's my suggestion: leave the top of the input open. If someone wants to enter a box (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: It's back! Long-Lost Jetpack Element Now Being Produced...
|
|
(...) So is it just being a minifig accessory, or did they come up with something creative to do with it? -Andrusi && (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: My Latest Creation
|
|
(...) Bryan... I'd be interested in knowing how you have your drive train setup. I'm sure it is too complicated to easily explain... Maybe a couple of pictures? I've tried a few RC buggy motor drive vehicles and have found that trying to send all (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) Interesting, I guess this is what you were trying to get at at dinner about a standardized interface. Your right this makes it much more challenging, and interesting. Although it nullifies one of my ideas. Which is fine, just less explosive. (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Motorized microscale train
|
|
Using thread instead of chain links is indeed a cheaper solution, and may even give more curving options. The only problem I'd see is propulsion, thread doesn't have as much ' grip' as chain links have. (...) (URL) + (URL) The wide chain link fits (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Another offer from JJ's: escritoire & iron stove
|
|
(...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
| |
| | London Underground 1995 Tube Stock
|
|
Mind the Gap! (URL) This is my 95ts train. It is the third of my LU creations but the first one to be functionally complete. The 1995 Tube Stock was built by GEC Aslthom Metro Cammell (now Alstom) as part of the PFI (priviate finance initiative) for (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.underground, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.trains, FTX) !
|
