 | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
(...) The big question is, why arent LEGO trains available on the retail shelves? I suspect part of it is because LEGO trains as a rule are expensive. Expensive compared to other LEGO sets (due to the cost of the electrics) And more to the point, (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 2.3.0.6 available (ldGLite working and looks Marvelous)
|
|
(...) Yeah, I can never remember how to attach gdb to a running process, so that one isn't in my usual bag of tricks. I'll have to try harder to remember it next time. Fortunately for me, Kevin already found the bug in lpub. :^) Don (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
(...) Australia is definitely not the unique case, but more likely the typical case. In the US, most consumers can only buy Lego trains online or from S@H. During the holiday shopping season, TRU may carry trains, but other than that, trains are (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
I've snipped all the rest away because I agree with it, close enough, and I want to focus on one thing... (...) THe following is my view but I believe it's pretty widely shared. LUGNET is (especially when it's working right) a meritocracy. You get (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 2.3.0.6 available (ldGLite working and looks Marvelous)
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Kevin L. Clague wrote: I just timed rendering of all the pedmatic construction step images and part list images and the process took less than 3 minutes! Amazing. After I debug ldglite and ldview on windows 98, then I'll work on the (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 2.3.0.6 available (ldGLite working and looks Marvelous)
|
|
(...) Actually it was a bug in LPub. ldglite pre-crops the image to the smallest enclosing rectangle. LPub didn't expect this, applied its own crop routine, and added artifacts. Also this pre-cropping is why ldglite process is much faster than (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | newsgroup
|
|
Nel newsgroup non trovo piu' i miei messaggi vecchi ...da cosa dipende?hanno una durata ? ho delle impostazione di correggere ? qualcuno sa darmi alcune risposte ?? si possono anche cancellare? Grazie. saluti. (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
(...) I was sent an email from somebody not associeated with Lugnet. It was a brickshelf reference about something that was repeatedly talked about by members of the public at our recent public train display. I don't know about you but juggling the (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase demonstration module
|
|
(...) I just spotted the use of ridged bricks on the airlocks - must remember to do that on my hex corridors from now on... Jason Railton (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: The all-new LUGNET .Underground
|
|
In lugnet.underground, Suzanne Rich Green wrote: snip (...) I don't think so, although it reminds me of the movie "Total Recall", in which they used those drilling-machines in the martian underground. (...) We certainly can, if they're underground, (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.underground, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The all-new LUGNET .Underground
|
|
In lugnet.underground, David Eaton wrote: snip (...) Thanks for your reply, and for the long list of other cool parts!! I'll add them over on the (URL) CRUST> page, with the others. (...) Agreed! Now, we just need to see some new "underground" MOCs (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.underground, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The all-new LUGNET .Underground
|
|
In lugnet.underground, Eric Sophie wrote: snip (...) Me, too. Those were some really new and cool color combos! (...) snip Thanks, and also for your subsequent (re)posts of your MOCs to the group. I'd love to see a Rock Raider mecha someday. "Big (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.underground, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Modifying the 6272c01 Electric RC Race Buggy Battery Receiver Unit with Auxiliary Output
|
|
(...) Tim, The "large thing" looks like some kind of coil+ferrite core to me. AFAIK That is really part of the tuned circuit for the radio reception. Now something that strikes me as really interesting is the operation of the steering motor. Is it a (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.parts.mod)
|
| |
| | Re: The all-new LUGNET .Underground
|
|
In lugnet.underground, Marc Nelson Jr. wrote: snip (...) Thanks, and also for the links; will add them soon! "Big Daddy" Nelson (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.underground, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Slug Photos
|
|
(...) Sorry, that should be 4th and 5th (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | [FreeLUG : French Enthusiast LEGO(c) User Group] Les nouveautés mardi 17 mai 2005
|
|
Bonjour Voici la lettre d'information du site "FreeLUG : French Enthusiast LEGO(c) User Group" ((URL) lettre recense les articles et les brèves publiés depuis 1 jours. Nouveaux articles ---...--- ** Summer Afol's Days ** par Nicolas HUYARD le 17 (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.org.fr.freelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Slightly more rational? (was: New Lego Track!)
|
|
(...) Oh yes! why are you not a marketing consultant for LEGO (...) Thanks Steve, keep the dream alive Gary Memeber #162 (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
(...) Accepted, I'm somewhat less disappointed now! (...) Yes, and a good start would be a larger radius curved track (had to add my plug) (...) I don't think its a risk rather than a lack of will (only my opinion) (...) True, and may I add (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
(...) Accepted, I'm somewhat less disappointed now! (...) Yes, and a good start would be a larger radius curved track (had to add my plug) (...) I don't think its a risk rather than a lack of will (only my opinion) (...) True, and may I add (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Tremate gente, tremate!
|
|
NOOOO! :-) anche tu entri a far parte del mecca-tronici! Mi fa piacere :-) ciao Giuliano matteo ha scritto: (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
