Subject:
|
Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 May 2005 07:09:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1724 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Bryan Kinkel wrote:
> Gary,
>
> Don't get all disappointed. It was me who originally made the post about the
> subject of the message. I was catching up on emails, LUGNET posts, etc and
> saw the "New Lego Track!" subject. Of course it was not what I expected it
> to be. If my post offended you, I apologize.
Accepted, I'm somewhat less disappointed now!
> I understand your frustration with the state of trains. I for one want to
> see automated points, lights, etc in the style of the 80s 12V system.
Yes, and a good start would be a larger radius curved track (had to add my plug)
> It is a well publicized fact that the LEGO company is in a dire financial
> situation. So I think it is easy to see why LEGO has not taken the 9V Train
> system to the next level. It is a big risk.
I don't think its a risk rather than a lack of will (only my opinion)
> And yes, it is even more frustrating to deal with when we see new products
> introduced with a lots of expensive new molds and a big marketing push.
True, and may I add frustrated hobbyists are not a good marketing stratergy.
> But look on the bright side - LEGO continues to release new train engines
> and rolling stock. We got a train shed last year. And they have the "Thomas
> the Tank Engine" license. (9V Thomas, please....)
>
> I think these are sure signs that the Train line is here to stay. My
> suggestion, when you place your order for the new 10170 TTX car, make sure
> the quantity is for at least 2 sets.
I'll probabaly be buying a few more than that, I'd say you would need at least 5
to make a decent container train. (and I'd also buy a hell of a lot of larger
radius curves if they were available)
>
> Let LEGO know you care about the train line.
I would say Shop@home already know that! (so does my credit card)
>
> -- Bryan
Thanks for your response Bryan, it's much apprecieated.
Gary
Member #162
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
| Gary, Don't get all disappointed. It was me who originally made the post about the subject of the message. I was catching up on emails, LUGNET posts, etc and saw the "New Lego Track!" subject. Of course it was not what I expected it to be. If my (...) (20 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
