 | | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) Erm, yes, point taken. ;-) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.fun.holiday, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) I dunno if it was so much a question of being right or not-- I think the difference of opinion was "is this a big deal" or not. There was some disagreement about whether or not they made any "promise" to us that they broke in re-releasing the (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) Ahh yes. I recall last year someone posted an announcement 'transcript' from a Danish newspaper claiming lego was going to change its brick geometry. (...) Since when are juniorised models 'something' anyway? ;-) Unlike Kelly I was lucky (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.fun.holiday, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) Large numbers of early april dates are usually a good indicator... :-) (...) Hmm... I got a very nice juniorised model and advice that there was nothing wrong with my browser. :-) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.fun.holiday, FTX)
|
| |
| | Wishful Thinking press release (was: Maersk Second Run)
|
|
(...) Yep, it's a pastiche. I clicked too... then I read the whole thing, and it became fairly apparent it was a humor piece. But he did set the FUT to lugnet.fun.holiday, but I'm not sure what "holiday" was for ;) Kelly (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.color, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Eopie
|
|
(...) Ha ha ha ha, I remember this thing! You captured it quite well, as always, Bruce. Well enough that I could recognize without having seen the films in years. Dan Rubin (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
This IS a joke right? I didn't get anything when I clicked the URL... Legoswami Samarth (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.fun.holiday, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 1038 ERBIE the Robo-Car?
|
|
(...) I was thinking there was a switch that you could clip on the battery box to control another motor. So, 1 box could control several motors through switches. But it's been a while... Steve (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Examples for the mosaic enthousiasts.
|
|
(...) Phil, how did you open it in Excel? I just tried to and it was jumbled. Any suggestions? (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.mosaic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Custom models for sale
|
|
Hello everybody, A small message to tell I have 2 custom sets for sale on eBay : Wampa and Probot. (2 URLs) The links are : Probot (URL) Wampa (URL) Happy bidding, Eric Druon / BaronSat (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.market.auction, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 1038 ERBIE the Robo-Car?
|
|
(...) I have one of those motors and a coupl eof the 4.5V battery boxes, I just can't imagine trying to control a two motor chassis in this way. (mental image of me with a battery box in each hand and a thumb on each of the forward/reverse levers) (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) Yes, and about many other things too. Look what I found in the "Press" section of the Lego website. (URL) For those too lazy to click, here's the text: Classic Grey LEGO bricks on sale again In very early April 2005 the LEGO Group will (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.fun.holiday, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: 1038 ERBIE the Robo-Car?
|
|
(...) Well, that's a 4.5v motor. They had a battery box that ran the motors. (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | 1038 ERBIE the Robo-Car?
|
|
Does anyone have more infomation/plans for 1038 ERBIE the Robo-Car? I fond the refence while searching Peeron, and jumped to the Lugnet Guide entry here: (URL) looks like it build some sort of dual drive chassis, but I can't imagine what powered (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: From beautiful downtown Burbank . . .
|
|
(...) Nice work Bruce!! Cyndi (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.town, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) Maybe the phrase "a place where most English-speaking communities connect" would be a more accurate term for LUGNET, since "center" does imply the other communities would orbit around LUGNET, which I don't think is accurate. So thanks for (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A query to GBC members, module builders, and technic model builders.
|
|
(...) I use the Technic chain to take the backlash out of gear trains, and to create gear trains in combinations that are not possible using only gears (due to spacing of the gears on beams etc.) Where one chain is not strong enough, clever designs (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | MOCs
|
|
Hi all, This is the first time I actually post MOCs. You can see two at (URL) admit the web site is not very active and I have only photographed a few MOCs. I will add an other model as soonas possible (I have photoes). Currently i am working on a (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.people.teens)
|
| |
| | Re: teen FOLs: do we actually exist?
|
|
(...) for me it's more like: "so, WHEN will you clear up your room??" "I did so just this morning." "No you did not, I can see that without even entering your room!" "Well, I just started to build this cool car..." (...) considering that I have (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.people.teens)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) Calum, I agree that there potentially *could* be some loss of support to the AFOLs from TLC. That's hard to predict, but... presumably as often is said, TLC is business. Presumably, the support/attention the AFOLs get form them is viewed as a (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
