|
|
 | | Re: 10152 Update: What has TLC to do to bring YOU up against them?
|
| (...) Wrong. TLC stated that they had old Maersk Blue pellets and 'wouldn't it be nice to give the AFOL a really cool set and use up the pellets at the same time'. Why should that negate future contracts? It was a business decision made at the time (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) I'm pretty sure the duck wasn't marketed as a "limited edition of 10,000". It really matters not what their excuss is if they changed their mind they could have changed the model. Their move was compleatly unethical and problably leaves them (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Whatever happened...
|
| (...) Well put Calum.... I feel the same way. Personally, all I ever read nowadays is rtlToronto, loc.ca, and technic sub-groups. Everytime I have ventured into the main group, and scanned some of the topics (the great dumb grey debate, people (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: MPD Builder ?
|
| (...) Yes, I am watching ! I don't think you can rely on anything to positively identify an unofficial part. We could enforce something in all files that are submitted to the Parts Tracker, but unofficial files could just be local to the user, with (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | RE: Problem with the new robolab2.5.4
|
| Sorry, I think I need to clarify further... - This is in the "Investigator" section, NOT the regular program area. - after I click on the big "upload" arrow, I changed the dataset name to, e.g., "ds1", but there is no graph. - I click on the "upload (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
Skipped 2 messages in
group
lugnet.off-topic.fun (Skip-filter settings)
|
