|
|
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) I'm pretty sure the duck wasn't marketed as a "limited edition of 10,000". It really matters not what their excuss is if they changed their mind they could have changed the model. Their move was compleatly unethical and problably leaves them (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Whatever happened...
|
| (...) Well put Calum.... I feel the same way. Personally, all I ever read nowadays is rtlToronto, loc.ca, and technic sub-groups. Everytime I have ventured into the main group, and scanned some of the topics (the great dumb grey debate, people (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: MPD Builder ?
|
| (...) Yes, I am watching ! I don't think you can rely on anything to positively identify an unofficial part. We could enforce something in all files that are submitted to the Parts Tracker, but unofficial files could just be local to the user, with (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | RE: Problem with the new robolab2.5.4
|
| Sorry, I think I need to clarify further... - This is in the "Investigator" section, NOT the regular program area. - after I click on the big "upload" arrow, I changed the dataset name to, e.g., "ds1", but there is no graph. - I click on the "upload (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
| | | | | Re: Whatever happened...
|
| You know, in my random stumblings among the leftovers from a nice community it's nice to find rtlToronto and Calums wise words once more. Perhaps one day I'll be back sharing the fun in full scale. This should provide som interesting responces from (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Skipped 3 messages in
group
lugnet.off-topic.fun (Skip-filter settings)
|
