 | | Re: Interesting point of view, Rene!
|
|
(...) It was correct, until TLC decided to make it incorrect by consciously changing their mind. (...) I think so. Then we would have recognized it as the typical BS advert hype which we all know to ignore. (...) Are you by chance a lawyer, Dave? If (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | BrickCommander® 2004 Finale
|
|
Hail MechWarriors! The year is near it's end, so I thought I really should create something special to present as the last BrickCommander model in 2004. Maybe something new from Mechwarrior 4? Something everybody would want to see? Something that (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting point of view, Rene!
|
|
In lugnet.lego, David Koudys wrote: <snip> (...) If they indeed said, "we will never produce this vehicle again" and they went ahead any way, you are okay with that??? Maybe this is a Liberal thing. It reminds me of a college professor who ran for a (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting point of view, Rene!
|
|
(...) What constitutes actual advertising versus an employee stating something incorrectly? Was the phrasing of the post on 1000steine run by Lego's legal department, just as a paid advertisement would be? If they had instead said "This MIGHT be (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Whats wrong with my MOCpage?
|
|
I've been meaning to do this post for a while now, because I don't know what's going on with my page, and I'm not sure where I should be posting this. Let me clarify that I love and always will love MOCPages, because I think its simply great that I (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish.html, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting point of view, Rene!
|
|
(...) David, what you're telling us with so many words is that you're happy with your existing collection so that you actually don't have to care what TLG does or does not. That's ok. Nothing wrong with being a happy AFOL dwelling in the past. 37 (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Mac MPD Utility 1.2 released
|
|
(...) I was using your old version last week! Awesome update. I'll make sure it gets updated on ldraw.org. Also, have you thought of posting this on VersionTracker.com? If you don't want to bother registering and all, I can post it under the name (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatever happened...
|
|
For more then a Year now I haven't read much on Lugnet other then rtl. You've just hit most of the reasons why. Derek (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | CT-12 and CT-39
|
|
I have been inspired to build a few airplanes ... well technically one airplane with two different ordinace schemes. First the CT-12 (URL) and the CT-39 (URL) Thank you. Cedar Sith P.s. These are the first planes that I have created and displayed on (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.town, lugnet.org.us.cedarlug, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
|
(...) Guten Tag, Rene! Hope fatherhood is treating you well:^D Thanks for bringing this into the discussion. It seems this information makes the case a little stronger against TLC. It's simply reckless and dishonest to advertise in this manner, IMO. (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
