 | | Re: Some 2005 sets showing up already in regular stores.
|
|
Someone on the website obviously noticed the traffic increase and either pulled the pictures (possibly due to LEGO intervention) or stopped deep linking. Either way, they are gone (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2005)
|
| |
| | Re: My Episode II Rant
|
|
(...) *** If it's not in the movies, it's not official! *** I believe this is Lucasfilm's official position. (...) Star Wars (A new hope) was fine. The Empire strikes back was fine. Unfortunately, sometime before The Return of the Jedi, Lucas began (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Oh Baby! Cool, new element!!
|
|
(...) I though the same thing myself It seems to be available in lots of the sets, often used as bumpers/fenders One of the new police sets has at least two of them in dark bley but he image I saw has been removed Tim (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | RCX has a fast clock, was Re: Rolling ball clock revisited
|
|
Hello dave, (...) A made an experiment this night using a RCX 2.0, the clock was fast by about 10s per hour. I suppose that this problem comes from bad capacitor loading of the crystal used on RCX. Crystals need to see some capacitance to oscillate (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: The Lego Logo
|
|
Remember it's not just what LEGO want to pursue, it is what they legally _have_ to pursue to maintain their trademarks and copyrights. The company may love for fan sites to show their logo and name prominently, but if they want to keep hold of their (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2648(2?) Container Grab
|
|
(...) Conventional wisdom is that imprints of the form N-NN are present to identify the indidual "well" in moulds that produce multiple copies of a part. Considering that the matching grip is 2649, I think it is highly likely that the part number (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | 4512, 8436, 10159, 4504
|
|
(...) Ciao Guido, spero che i tre camion che ti ho mandato verranno catalizzati... Grazie per la recensione positiva. Vorrei precisare prima che ricapiti l'errore, che sbagliai a scrivere nel primo post il prezzo dell'8436... che non è 65,99 ma (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.it.itlug.market)
|
| |
| | Re: Rolling ball clock revisited
|
|
Hi Rob, (...) I tried a similar mechanism (a large inclined plane with a width reduction in the end), the problem is that LEGO balls are somewhat rough, and they tend to form a locked arch above width shrinking. I even tried to add a stirring (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Rolling ball clock revisited
|
|
(...) Thanks, Bob! I hope you'll get as much pleasure building my arm as I got building your clock... Philo (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | 1988 Technic set up on ebay!
|
|
Just a heads-up for you guys, there is a 8865 set in the UK on ebay. Description states that the box and instructions are there, But the model looks like a alternate model. also said to include the 8700 moter set. Good luck! (URL) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
