 | | Re: Final draft of the letter?
|
|
"David Eaton" <deaton@intdata.com> wrote in message news:I80AH4.1088@lugnet.com... (...) a (...) compatibility. (...) written (...) don't (...) disappointed (...) I understand. I composed this letter with the idea that it wouldn't be a letter from (...) (21 years ago, 1-Dec-04, to lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Final draft of the letter?
|
|
"James Wilson" <wilson_j_s@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:I805EB.1wMK@lugnet.com... (...) person], (...) to (...) communication, (...) 500 (...) sit up (...) I totally agree, James. I tried to leave most of that part of the letter blank for (...) (21 years ago, 1-Dec-04, to lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Ferrari
|
|
(...) year's large Technic supercar - large technic sets have traditionally been released in the summer in north america. However, the smaller scale "model Team" Ferrari Enzo has been spotted and purchased at TRU in the US, and is also in TRU (...) (21 years ago, 1-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | question about inputs & outputs
|
|
ok this is a funky idea, but I've already got some evidence it can work. I *really* need 4 outputs, but I only need 2 inputs for my project. Is there some way, using brickOS (I assume it's impossible without modifying firmware), to reprogram an (...) (21 years ago, 1-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: why doesn't this work?
|
|
(...) That doesn't totally seem right. I would think it would slow, before stoping. One last thing to try is actually storing sensor value in the array. Also, in the Checkvar function, it looks like the line: if(temp<27) temp=0; should say (...) (21 years ago, 1-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
