|
|
 | | Re: New Poll
|
| In lugnet.trains, Matthew J. Chiles writes: <snip history of LEGO train gauge> (...) "thin challenged"? (...) Ahh, my new favorite pet scale: 8wide....GAUGE:-) (1:24 scale) Of course you are right, Matt. When I model "prototypically", it is really (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
| (...) Nope. Not doing that at all. No intentional leaks. Jake --- Jake McKee Senior Producer LEGO Direct (22 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 2003 Trains - great!
|
| (...) At a minimum, you need a state sales tax license which will probably require state registration as a business. Don't assume that there is any great savings by purchasing from Marz. LEGO leaves them very little margin, especially with new (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
| (...) I think this is an interesting point, and it wouldn't surprise me if there were some truth to this idea. TLC knows that Lugnetters, by nature, will (1) seek out any info they can find on upcoming sets, and (2) thoroughly, mercilessly criticize (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Is Lego false advertising the new 2003 sets?
|
| "Barbie does not actually walk and talk on her own..." lol : ) -Rob "Bryan Kinkel" <helpdesk@loseyourmind.com> wrote in message news:H8EurK.7Mr@lugnet.com... (...) shows (...) situation" (...) the (...) are (...) parts (...) this (...) true (...) be (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
