To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *374800 (-10)
  Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT
 
In my problem description I didn't mention that I had actually included the part in an mlcad model, so effectively it was created as a Type 1 line. The solution to the problem though seems to have been removing the part from the ldraw models (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: New LEGO Star Wars Sets... (wishful thinking)
 
(...) That sounds feasible. Not much playability, but a cheap way to get clones. (...) Again, not much playability, but a cheap Jango. (...) Erm, that scene was pretty much represented in set #7113. (...) I think TLC is though with Episode I (...) (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Building times (again)
 
(...) BTW, I talked to Steve McDonough and he will be there. Not sure when. Steve Martin (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.org.us.indylug)
 
  Re: Roll Call! (((Almost 50)))
 
I think adding the good Dr Carney as #50 would be a nice way to round off the roll call. I don't think anyone would argue he's an enormous part of the castle community (even the spacers would admit that). Any objections? (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.castle)
 
  Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT
 
I appear to have answered my own question, though I don't understand the answer :) It seems that if the part is located in the LDRAW\MODELS directory, the extended face problem exists. If the part is moved into LDRAW\PARTS, however, the problem (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Brick Sorting
 
Hi Alex, The other suggestions in this thread may be better for you, but since you asked us to share, I will tell you my methods for sorting... As usual, I will share this in the form of a long babbling story. ;) When I was six (1978) I owned a Fire (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.storage)
 
  Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT  [DAT]
 
(...) I assume you converted this code: 0 Tile 1 x 2 test 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\3069bs01.dat 4 16 20 0 10 -20 0 10 -20 0 -10 20 0 -10 The explaination is that L3P shrinks all the parts/subparts (i.e. Type 1 lines) slightly for the seam (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Building times (again)
 
(...) Count me in. I'll be there about 1. mark (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.org.us.indylug)
 
  Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT
 
(...) Do you have the seam option turned on? This option causes the parts to be scaled a little smaller to generate the seams between parts. For rendering single parts, turn the seam option off. Niels (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: sfbay target clearance @ 50% off...
 
You just need to check every local target. I hit 4 yesterday, and all had switched to 50% off on the MOT sets. I was nice and only bought ONE of the large train set, leaving some for others. I can't say that for the caboose, though ;-) Odds are your (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR