 | | Re: Multitasker test script
|
|
Perhaps I should not have stripped all the comments for speed :) \ The rationale for the delay above and the delay after the IR flash is \ that the message is 77 bits of 417 microseconds each, a total \ transmission time of 32 milliseconds, the (...) (27 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Multitasker test script
|
|
(...) It was this line that trashed the task chain when the power button was pressed, I thought I'd checked it a few times but perhaps it was something else. (...) Yes. What I really want is an equivalent of SendMessage in NQC (which maps to opcode (...) (27 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: All UK Groups subscribed?
|
|
(...) Technically, you did break a rule of the LUGNET Terms of Use. But I think it's obvious to everyone here that you had no malicious intentions; your actions were with decent and innocent intentions. I wrote a script to go through and cancel all (...) (27 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Racers screenshot
|
|
(...) The one at (URL) really freaky (to me). Seeing a Mini-Figure with his arms out like that -- it just ain't right! :-) That's gotta hurt. -- joshua (27 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: What do the set numbers mean?
|
|
(...) <big ol' snip> (...) Hmm. I am uncomfortable with the term "discovered". Let's say I recently _entered_ them. (...) There are the original "Universal" building sets, from the very beginning of LEGO releases. Surf here for more... (URL) see (...) (27 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: All UK Groups subscribed?
|
|
(...) Well, I've thought about this more, and there's really nothing I can do (that's 100% safe) to correct the problem with the article counts. They simply permeate the system too deeply, and it would take many hours of grueling fancy-footwork to (...) (27 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 99-03 Voting: Quick Comments
|
|
(...) I wish I knew for a _fact_ that this is (was) the case, but I can't say so with any certainty. I would suppose that using an existing mold to create an axle, and then cutting threads into the element, makes a lot more sense than trying to (...) (27 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: A recursion question/test...
|
|
Actually, it came from a conversation I was having about how "religious" some people are about technology. My stance was that there is no supreme hardware or software, they all suck in their own unique way. "So what you're saying is that you are a (...) (27 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: All UK Groups subscribed?
|
|
(...) Naw, nobody's in trouble... Richard and Simon were just trying to be helpful. I just reckon there are much cleaner solutions. --Todd (27 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: All UK Groups subscribed?
|
|
(...) [Pardon me for the apparent harsh tone -- it's not actually harsh -- what follows is a very serious question, not a wise-crack...] How could someone possibly find a tiny local group and manage to post to it, yet not realise that there is a (...) (27 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
