 | | Re: tightening up mecha joints
|
|
(...) Well, it's kinda annoying to do, but something I did for my mech (the legs would just bow right out when I tried to pose him) was a method using paper slips. I cut some very narrow slips of paper, and for each technic pin joint, I would stick (...) (26 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: IC registration number
|
|
Hi John, (from their web pages (URL) Newton Research Labs, Inc. 4140 Lind Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98055 Tel: 425.251.9600 Fax: 425.251.8900 mailto:support@newtonlabs.com I've had a similar problem (system I was running lost the HD, big time crash) (...) (26 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re: tightening up mecha joints
|
|
I use Saran Wrap, personally, but I suppose any thin material will do. ~Mark (26 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Project proposal: Seven Wonders of the LEGO World
|
|
(...) Ah. It's Bo**S**man not BoWman. Do we have a soundex search facility? (URL) those, drooled already. Definitely a candidate and then some. And to John K's point about 7 being limiting, yes. However we can get more than 7 if we artificially (...) (26 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Project proposal: Seven Wonders of the LEGO World
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) I don't think Dennis posts to LUGNET but he won CLSotW Late last year: (URL) will get you there and believe me it is worth it!! Eric Kingsley The New England LEGO Users Group (URL) (26 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: UPDATED Part - 30200 Windscreen 6 x 6 Octagonal Canopy Base
|
|
(...) Nice job! Do you mind if we put this part in the Cockpit category? It fits better there. Steve (26 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT [DAT]
|
|
(...) Since you included the update-comment: (...) I'd be inclined to not change the author line. Earlier version: (...) Jeremy's change: (...) If you're going to remove the neck-mark, you might just as well do: 1 16 0 -4 0 6 0 0 0 -8 0 0 0 6 (...) (26 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: MLCAD rotation (future request)
|
|
(...) But an include function is different from a subfile function. Basically, anything in a subfile is scoped to that subfile, and doesn't exist outside of the subfile. Yet another reason for a 0 INCLUDE (or 0 MACRO) meta-statement. Steve (26 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | West End TRU
|
|
I went to the West End TRU last night. Only a few things of note. First, the UFO large ship (Interstellar Starfighter?) was on deep discount for $27.99. They had two left. Ironically, with 280 some pieces, this is right around $.10 per piece. The (...) (26 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.us.va.ric)
|
| |
| | Re: MLCAD rotation (future request)
|
|
(...) The original definition for MPD states that data before the first 0 FILE statement will be ignored. This is because it was assumed that MPD streams would appear mostly in e-mail messages with included DAT content. Something like: ===...=== Hi! (...) (26 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
