 | | Re: R: J-BOX: Danni di trasporto 8-((((
|
|
(...) Ah io mi astengo ..... il bello e' che poi in posta mi prendono per il culo quando faccio pacchi da 20 cm di lato pieni di patatine di polistirolo e gommapiuma per spedire magari una decina di integrati che stanno in una loro scatoletta di (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: Clarrification needed
|
|
(...) It's really for however Brad and the community (working together) thinks it best suits the both together. Personally, I would take a debate analzying LD's actions elsewhere and come back and summarize concisely after it concluded, so as not to (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 set info
|
|
(...) Hey, or maybe it was a misplaced decimal? UCS AT-ST for $99.99, anyone? (I'm not mocking you, by the way, in fact, I say you're most likely right or pretty close to it.) Greg "There was a guy... an underwater guy who controlled the sea... got (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Censors / information
|
|
(...) give (...) What other sites? (...) they (...) There is no such thing as a true "indie" site in the modern corpratist world. True "Indie" sites get sued out of existence. Look at the recent Apple disclosure mess. Companies (right or wrong) take (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Legal Legal legal
|
|
I read with amusement some of the posts on legal matters concerning leaked information. I treat this site as a discussion group. People just talking about Lego etc just as if they were face to face. What has this got to do with lawyers ??? If (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
