Subject:
|
Re: 2001 set info
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 23:26:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
528 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Geordan Ballantree writes:
>
> You guys are all saying that the new atst is going to suck because it is only
> $9.99, but a at-st at that price isn't even feasible. Could it be that there
> was a cut off at the begining of the price? I'm only a kid so I might be like
> totally wrong on this subject but that just might be the case
>
> cheers
>
> Geordan
Hey, or maybe it was a misplaced decimal? UCS AT-ST for $99.99, anyone? (I'm
not mocking you, by the way, in fact, I say you're most likely right or pretty
close to it.)
Greg "There was a guy... an underwater guy who controlled the sea... got
killed by 10 million pounds of sludge from New York and New Jersey" Majewski
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Dome/1888/abs.html
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | re: 2001 set info
|
| You guys are all saying that the new atst is going to suck because it is only $9.99, but a at-st at that price isn't even feasible. Could it be that there was a cut off at the begining of the price? I'm only a kid so I might be like totally wrong (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
