 | | Re: Indy & legOS bugs... :-)
|
|
(...) <g>, :-? (...) quali (...) Beh, io ho come riferimento la mia pista di prova. Senza variazioni sulla meccanica (che era quello che mi ero riproposto, se solo avesse funzionato completamente il sw), "dovrei" aver guadagnato circa 0.7 (9.2s (...) (26 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: Sfida LF5: proposta
|
|
(...) robot. (...) dovranno (...) essere (...) l'uno (...) rilevazione (...) Hai perfettamente ragione... Che pollo... :-) Non ci pensavo... (...) collocati (...) A 2 metri di distanza? Non è poco... Io li metterei di fronte sì, ma al max a 25 - (...) (26 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: DINOTRON: A cross-system hybrid MOC theme
|
|
(...) Prolly, but this is more excitement than .duplo gets in a month, usually, right? They say it's good to take your machinery out and floor it every once in a while, cleans out built up gunk and carbon. So we're giving .duplo it's monthly spin. (...) (26 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.duplo)
|
| |
| | Re: Ebay acution - Potential Fraud?
|
|
(...) Nope. It was a photo of the assembled set, sitting in/next to the box, on the person's dining room table. The photo on the offending auction has been changed (possibly because the seller of the original auction complained to eBay?), and the (...) (26 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Ebay acution - Potential Fraud?
|
|
(...) Thanks for the clarification. Even LESS covered by Lego copyright and even MORE covered by the copyright asserted by the person who took the photo. ++Lar (26 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Ebay acution - Potential Fraud?
|
|
(...) Yep. That's what I was getting at. :D eric (26 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Ebay acution - Potential Fraud?
|
|
(...) The guy removed my original picture and replaced it with the loego brochure scan after I complained to him So what you see now isnt what I originally complained about regards lawrence (26 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Review of 3401 Shoot 'N Score
|
|
(...) Sorry people, I meant the "new train stuff" most people got so excited about which got over 160 posts. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I have indeed seen all the footie stuff already. There's even a mini-catalogue of these. Regards, Torsten (26 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Minifig Packs - Thoughts
|
|
Well, I'm glad I read Lugnet this afternoon. I'm putting your thoughts into the next batch going to LEGO today. Let's see what they say. Tim (URL) (26 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: '59 Caddy Hovercar Raytraces
|
|
Bram, Very nice work (as usual)! (...) Do you use Anton's parts library as well? I ask because of the smoothness of the minifigs' head...much smoother than the ones I've rendered using stock L3P output. Will Lego Beach Department of Emergency (...) (26 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
