 | | Digital Camera with LEGO
|
|
Of course I've seen the threads going on in here about doing a "Digital Camera" out of LEGO... The idea is solid and seems to make sense. The only problem I've got now is I don't have any way to use the information in the datalog of the RCX. (...) (26 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Argh! Need Help with POV-Ray
|
|
(...) I don't think this makes sense since the programs you're comparing perform totally different tasks (albeit for the purpose a common goal). There is nothing wrong with L2P, you just have to know how to use it. Set up your path in POV-Ray to (...) (26 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: John E. Doolittle
|
|
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Bruce Schlickbernd (<Fp7nEI.50G@lugnet.com>) wrote at 17:32:42 (...) Arr! And throw lubbers to the sharks! (26 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| |
| | Re: re-What is happening to LEGO in UK +others
|
|
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 17:01:02 GMT, Lawrence Wilkes uttered the following profundities... (...) I can fill-in a bit more with regards to the Thames Valley, more specifically Bucks. Woolies in High Wycombe seems to be purging their stock of Lego. (...) (26 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: re-What is happening to LEGO in UK +others
|
|
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 17:14:32 GMT, Lawrence Wilkes uttered the following profundities... (...) Even the basic brick boxes are extortionate in price. 20 quid for 848 pieces? Compared to normal sets, not bad, but I am sure everyone remembers 1857, 950 (...) (26 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
