 | | Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | (...) Gosh, thanks. I wasn't sure whether I could expect that sort of lobbying to be taken seriously! And I've clearly not been into trains for long enough or I would have remembered to mention _matching_brown_doors_. :) I'm a bit disappointed with (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I'm under NDA so can't discuss exactly what was said about what we want. But what do you think? You wouldn't expect that we would have asked for things way different that what we asked for publicly in this group and elsewhere, would you? If (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | (...) One thing I would take as giving some hope to getting a new type of train driver is that TLC has created special parts which have so far only showed up in a single set, and not even a high volume set. I suspect that if TLC gets a good feeling (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Rose Regner
|
| | | | | | Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) Can I ask if something was discussed? I have been thinking about the studios line. Every store is selling the accessory sets, which I think are rather limiting in appeal if you don't have the main set. Why (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) You are correct about the cross appeal of trains, which is one reason why LD is interested in them. (...) One point of fact-- remember, LD is about *direct* marketing to consumers, bypassing the retail channel (I assume that is what you mean (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Rose Regner
|
| | | | | | | John Neal wrote in message <3A832BFD.F599C578@u...st.net>... (...) Yea, I'm just one of those people that likes to ogle over a set in person. Rose (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) I thought they were about direct contact, not just direct marketing. Steve (23 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) -John (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Hey, don't get us wrong-- we shot for the moon! But Rome wasn't built in a day, and everything we wanted won't be produced tomorrow, and maybe never. But the Romans are breaking ground;-) LTCs and LTDs (LEGO Train Dudes) caught the interest (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | "Jason J. Railton" <j.j.railton@cwcom.net> wrote in message news:G8G99D.BtE@lugnet.com... (...) Well, I'll do what I can, I've done lobbying for trains before, but I don't know what I can do beyond the scope of what was discussed at the Train (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | (...) I'm very grateful, but I don't intend to cause any problems, particularly so close following the Train Summit. It was just another suggestion, one among many I'm sure. But, I would like to see those elements in those colours, and I'm sure a (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I certainly don't think so! Discussion is great. Asking questions is great. Intelligent speculation using what is publicly known and what business literate people know about how businesses run is great. And you can divine some remarkable (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | | | (...) It's not exactly the tone. I guess it's just that no-one else can really follow an answer along the lines of 'I know, but I can't tell'. (...) Well, thanks Larry. I've always had model trains, just not LEGO ones because they're too expensive. (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —James Brown
|
| | | | | | (...) This would be a great way to break in, and an even more affordable price point. As to the income thing...That's what I meant by saying "barely" - 60 bucks is a lot of money to a kid, but can be done; a $5 a week allowance is not uncommon, I (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) Well, right now, you could put yourself a "push" train the following way: $45 3 3737 Train Accessories $26 2 4520 Eight Curved Rails ---...--- $71 You then use your existing collection to build an engine and two cars. Unfortunately this points (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Excellent analysis, Frank! I just have to question whether people will pay 75 for a push train when for 60 more they can have the excitement of powered operation. Why did Duplo go powered? When I was buying Duplo for Taya (9 years ago when she (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | (...) I suspect that an unpowered train wouldn't exist to serve the 'system OK, power bad' market segment, but rather the 'train set under $120 (US)'. If LEGO were able to release a complete train set (more than 1 car, and track oval) for (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) While we're asking, why did *Brio* go powered?? To me, Brio was the last hold out of the old-school, traditional toy train. But have you seen Brio lately? (Have you seen Brio *prices* lately?;) Not what we played (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —John R. Clark
|
| | | | | | | | This may want to followup somewhere other than trains, but I can't decide where... (...) I think you'd be wrong there. You think you'd enjoy it, but you wouldn't. Because after turning the train on, what is there to do? Nothing, really. Powering (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) Of course the powered DUPLO train is battery powered. They do still have a push train (though it doesn't come with track - a good decision for DUPLO I think, at that age, kids may not need a track). One thought I have is that many LTCs could (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | "Jason J. Railton" <j.j.railton@cwcom.net> wrote in message news:G8Hw6M.409@lugnet.com... (...) I'll see - but from what I've heard about who will be attending, it doesn't look like its very possible. Causing problems - hmm, I doubt you'd cause (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
