Subject:
|
Re: 6 vs. 8 wide?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 22:09:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5033 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Mike Poindexter writes:
> This new point motor WILL BE 8-wide hell. If these things come to pass, I
> will want them, as I am sure the rest of the GMLTC will. Will this cause
> them to switch back to 6 wide rolling stock? And how will John Neal take
> it? 8-wide and no switches or 6 wide and DCC? What a dilemma!
>
> Mike
But what a nice dilemma to have! (I'd vote for 8-wide trains...)
John Neal is too busy building *14* wide "G" scale cars... ;-)
JohnG, GMLTC
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 6 vs. 8 wide?
|
| I realize that, but what if the simple installation of an automatic point makes clearance of 8-wide trains impossible? Do we then not allow the remote points on 8 wide layouts? What about layouts that are 6 wide, but will connect to 8 wide train (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
149 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
