Subject:
|
Re: Small Mini's contest
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Apr 2004 08:35:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1284 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, David Laswell wrote:
| |
I think my favorite would be the one opposite the swing-wing plane. Are the
long skinny ships designed to carry the little tiny one, or is that just a
coincidence of shape?
|
hmm... more like a coincidence
| |
The capital ship itself is quite interesting as well, but I do have two
complaints. One is that part of the ship extends directly behind the
engines, ...
|
well, with these impuls lowering nuclear transmigration warp coils powered ships
engines, this does not matter.
| |
... and the other is that the triple cluster of landing bays is all set
up to launch directly at each other. My thought would be that they’d all be
set up in a row to launch in the same direction.
|
yes, we know, after the first chrash during simultaneous launching, the main
engeneer-designer was fired. He will be replaced soon.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Small Mini's contest
|
| (...) There's absolutely no reason why you couldn't make the base deeper if you want, but like I said, I wanted to see what I could produce going strictly within the confines that you defined. If it weren't for that, I probably would have come up (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
