 | | Re: Brickshelf problems? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) You cannot say that for sure. (...) My main concern and why I kept voting "unsure" was that this parody has the LEGO(r) logo on it. I really don't want to see a huge debate break out about this. It's been discussed in some depth before that (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf problems? —Anthony Sava
|
| | | | | (...) <SNIP> (...) <SNIP> Sorry to nit-pick, and maybe I'm just badgering the point, and maybe the images were changed before they were uploaded. But the enhanced image that I saw (as I did not look at these images until after they were re-uploaded) (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Brickshelf problems? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes you are, and yes they were. The original image had the LEGO logo in it not a parody. But even the parody is a technical violation of the fairplay document... one that lots of people do (similar parodies or distortions that is) but a (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Brickshelf problems? —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | | | (...) Lar, Less typing, more clicking. I want everyone to be able to see my pics soon. ;-) Jude FUT .o-t.debate cause it ain't worth it even though you are right (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf problems? —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | (...) Why would a company feel upset about free advertising? I mean, it is not as if the picture was in any way an insult to the ice-cream... I agree I cannot tell for sure that they *won't* feel hurt, but what I said is *it is unlikely* they'll (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickshelf problems? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | In lugnet.publish, Pedro Silva writes: <snip> That's all plowed ground, I am not going to debate it here. (...) If I understand your question the answer of late is: Orbital - 2 Chemical Brothers - Exit Planet Dust Paul Oakenfold - Tranceport or (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickshelf problems? —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | (...) I did not know that - please apologize the persistence :-( (...) Huh... rythm, as in "the average pace in which you (reviewer) review files". I should have used "review" instead of "analysis", but the first does not exist in my native language (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickshelf problems? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Ah. OK. The answer is it depends. External factors: How fast does the page load? That's driven by the network load. I have a cable modem connection to the internet and a 100 Mbps internal network. During the day the network is loaded because (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickshelf problems? —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | (...) Careful... How do you know that the name at the top of the folder is the person who uploaded each file? KL (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickshelf problems? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Um, I'm assuming that I found the right person by looking their name up, and I'm walking their tree. If the folders I see there when I start don't match up with what I expect to see (because I know who they are and what they put there (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickshelf problems? —Joseph Williams
|
| | | | (...) Since your doing some mammoth overhaul on Brickshelf right now, I was wondering if you could implement a new browsing feature: by member number. Is there some sort of privacy policy that would break if it was available? I know I would be using (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
