To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27660
    Re: The Brick Testament's entirely unnacceptable intellectual dishonesty —Brendan Powell Smith
   Hi, Steve. I've moved this over to off-topic.debate since that seemed more appropriate. (...) I am presenting the story of how Jesus insulted a Canaanite woman. I grant that this can also be seen as part of a larger story about how Jesus exorcised (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
   
        Re: The Brick Testament's entirely unnacceptable intellectual dishonesty —Brendan Powell Smith
     After continued discussion with others about this matter (not on LUGNET), I've decided to add two more illustrations to the Canaanite Dogs story. I now realize that my original version really makes it appear as though Jesus does not heal the woman, (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)  
    
         Re: The Brick Testament's entirely unnacceptable intellectual dishonesty —Marc Nelson Jr.
     (...) That's very decent of you. Great work as ever, Brendan! Marc Nelson Jr. (URL) Marc's Creations>> (18 years ago, 4-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
   
        Re: The Brick Testament's entirely unnacceptable intellectual dishonesty —Bruce Hietbrink
   Hey Brendan, I appreciate the fact that you added the final two illustrations to the Canaanite woman story. I think that it was right to do so, as to leave those out seriously misrepresented the story. While your commentary on how everyone selects (...) (18 years ago, 6-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)  
   
        Re: The Brick Testament's entirely unnacceptable intellectual dishonesty —Brendan Powell Smith
   Hi, Bruce. Thanks for the comments on this matter, too. I will probably redo the Acts story as part of my revamp of the New Testament part of the site, and will add the missing panels there as well. I think it's not just that it would be (...) (18 years ago, 7-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
   
        Re: The Brick Testament's entirely unnacceptable intellectual dishonesty —Stephen Bishop
   Just wanted to chime in again and say I appreciate your thoughtful response to my concerns. I also wanted to say I really enjoy your work, even when I don't agree with the commentary and editing decisions. And I look forward to more entries. Thanks, (...) (18 years ago, 13-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR