To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.mediawatchOpen lugnet.mediawatch in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 MediaWatch / 1538
1537  |  1539
Subject: 
Re: Trademark defense doesn't work vs Mega Bloks
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general
Date: 
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 13:04:28 GMT
Viewed: 
2137 times
  
Hi Matt,

"mat" <mjeffery@seatonhs.sa.edu.au> writes:

The LEGO trademark on the standard brick must have expired years ago,

don't confuse trademarks (which don't expire),
patents (which do 20 years after filing), and
copyright (which expire 70 years ofter the death of the creator).

Here LEGO had a patent on the shape of the blocks, which expired long ago,
but the trademark is invalid because the shape is dictated by
technical requirements.


Jürgen

--
Jürgen Stuber <juergen@jstuber.net>
http://www.jstuber.net/
gnupg key fingerprint = 2767 CA3C 5680 58BA 9A91  23D9 BED6 9A7A AF9E 68B4



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Trademark defense doesn't work vs Mega Bloks
 
(...) Well, that's fair enough. The LEGO trademark on the standard brick must have expired years ago, it's only the fact that the community automatically associates said brick design with LEGO that prevented Megabloks taking it for themselves ages (...) (20 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, FTX)

18 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR