Subject:
|
Re: 1 Question: assurances & limitations [Re: LEGOFan.net - central community... ]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org, lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 04:04:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
608 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Scott Arthur wrote:
>
> > Jake can you clarify this? I expect ‘support’ and use of the word “lego” in
> > the url has been given subject to assurances or limitations with regard the
> > content of the site.
>
> Actually not. What we _have_ discussed is to make it possible for parents to
> decide that some classes of content is unsuitable for their children, and for
> users of the site to decide some age limits for access to content/discussion
> groups they create. The implementation is not fixed yet, but I hope we will get
> around to publish the current specification soon.
one of the points made by Brad Justus in the original WorldLUG discussion was
that kid-oriented information is mired in a morass of legal difficulties
particularly in Europe. There are laws about what you can show them, what you
can ask them, what you can collect from them, cookies, etc.
Please, please, be sure that you are familiar with these issues or you run
serious legal risks.
-paul
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: 1 Question: assurances & limitations
|
| (...) I have a somewhat different view of things. I would rather block access to my server from the USA than having to be responsible for its content according to laws in the USA. (...) Only sensible rules. And they are basically the same for (...) (20 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
208 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
