To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.legoOpen lugnet.lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / 629
Subject: 
Re: The sky is *not* falling
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Followup-To: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:41:49 GMT
Viewed: 
4402 times
  
In lugnet.lego, Jake McKee wrote:
   Mindstorms

Mindstorms is not going away, but may continue to evolve. Like all technology products, Mindstorms will continue to grow and improve as consumers gain new technology knowledge and technology itself continues to get better and smaller.

On behalf of rtlToronto, I want to thank you for keeping all of us us in the loop. We don’t get too worked up over the usual Lego rumours up here (“Oh no, the new grey causes cancer, etc”) but this one is very important to us. We even stopped talking about Chris’ lack of C programming skills for a few minutes to discuss it at dinner :)

I know there’s nothing concrete, or as concrete as may like (Like, “Yes, Chris and Calum, there will be a RCX 3.0, it will have 82 IO ports and by the way, four cases are scheduled to be shipped 6.29PM April 1st to the west side dock door at the TRU in South Etobicoke”) but it’s good to know that we have a friend in Lego and that Mindstorms isn’t going away.

I’m sure all of us are glad that Mindstorms will stay in some form, whatever that is.

Calum


Subject: 
RCX 3.0 with 82 ports...Wow!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:07:21 GMT
Viewed: 
3488 times
  
In lugnet.lego, Calum Tsang wrote:
   “Yes, Chris and Calum, there will be a RCX 3.0, it will have 82 IO ports



How big is that succker going to be? How many batteries will it take? Where will they fit all those ports (is that 41 motor ports AND 41 sensor ports?)

What kind of a contest would use something like that?

Bruce


Subject: 
Re: RCX 3.0 with 82 ports...Wow!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:31:05 GMT
Viewed: 
3671 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Bruce Sheridan wrote:
   In lugnet.lego, Calum Tsang wrote:
   “Yes, Chris and Calum, there will be a RCX 3.0, it will have 82 IO ports

How big is that succker going to be?

48 x 48 studs, with colour TFT display..... mmmmmmmm.....

   How many batteries will it take?

As many as you can afford?

   Where will they fit all those ports (is that 41 motor ports AND 41 sensor ports?)

Oh no they’ll all be multi-purpose, assignable to either input or output, or a combination LOL

   What kind of a contest would use something like that?

A Big A$$ one.

ROSCO


Subject: 
Re: RCX 3.0 with 82 ports...Wow!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:22:11 GMT
Viewed: 
3645 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Bruce Sheridan wrote:

   What kind of a contest would use something like that?

rtlToronto28: The Industrial Automation PLC Is Normal

rtlToronto34: Show Me the Digital Flight Control System!

rtlToronto52: A Theatre Lighting Controller Too Far

Calum


Subject: 
Re: RCX 3.0 with 82 ports...Wow!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:38:14 GMT
Viewed: 
3695 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote:
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Bruce Sheridan wrote:

What kind of a contest would use something like that?

rtlToronto28: The Industrial Automation PLC Is Normal

rtlToronto34: Show Me the Digital Flight Control System!

I don't think this'll be a good idea--any mention of "flight control software"
this could land the builder with a visit from the local authorities...

http://www.recorder.com/Headlines/tuesday_basic.htm

(second news article)

Ahh, Americans--gotta love 'em... oh wait, maybe this should have been posted in
o-t.d...

<snip>

Calum

Dave K


Subject: 
Re: RCX 3.0 with 82 ports...Wow!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:27:57 GMT
Viewed: 
3678 times
  
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:31:05AM +0000, Ross Crawford wrote:
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Bruce Sheridan wrote:
How many batteries will it take?

As many as you can afford?

Pft.  I'll run off a cold fusion reactor, fueled by tap water.
Batteries.  Pft, I say!

--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com


Subject: 
Re: RCX 3.0 with 82 ports...Wow!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:27:20 GMT
Viewed: 
3744 times
  
"David Koudys" <dkoudys@redeemer.on.ca> wrote:

http://www.recorder.com/Headlines/tuesday_basic.htm

(second news article)

It just confirms how glad I am I live in Canada when I read junk like that.
Holy crap.

    Iain (States got da coasters, but we got da flats!)

PS - Probably no robot from me for marbles (surprise surprise), but I have a
good reason and it's a long story.


Subject: 
Re: RCX 3.0 with 82 ports...Wow!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:15:00 GMT
Viewed: 
4086 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Bruce Sheridan wrote:
   In lugnet.lego, Calum Tsang wrote:
   “Yes, Chris and Calum, there will be a RCX 3.0, it will have 82 IO ports



How big is that sucker going to be?

I heard it was going to use Blue Tooth technology, and allow you to connect 256 I/O devices wirelessly. The actual controller fits into a 2x2 plate, and runs on 1 lithium battery. It has a 1ghz processor, and 1gb ROM.

Someone else said it has an AC adaptor jack, but I think they were just making that up, because that’s just silly.


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR