| |
In lugnet.general, Jake McKee wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Dave Schuler wrote:
>
> > It might be worth noting that this doesn't suggest that TLG will actually take
> > AFOL input into consideration--merely that TLG won't make the change without
> > AFOL input. The input might easily be ignored, but TLG can still claim to have
> > accepted AFOL input...
>
> Wow. That's harsh.
Heh.
Well, what can I say? I tend to be an "on the dark side" kind of guy...
Harsh, perhaps--but is my assessment inaccurate? Aside from the bottom line,
corporations love nothing as much as preserving wiggle room.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Color Change - Final Update
|
| (...) I suppose, you could be right, but I think it misses the entire point of why we would ask for feedback in the first place. Why would we even bother to ask if we didn't think we would somehow use it? The point of us agreeing to include AFOLs (...) (20 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
260 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
