Subject:
|
Re: Color Change - Final Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 May 2004 17:47:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9552 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Dave Schuler wrote:
> It might be worth noting that this doesn't suggest that TLG will actually take
> AFOL input into consideration--merely that TLG won't make the change without
> AFOL input. The input might easily be ignored, but TLG can still claim to have
> accepted AFOL input...
Wow. That's harsh.
Jake
---
Jake McKee
Community Liaison
LEGO Community Development
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Color Change - Final Update
|
| (...) Heh. Well, what can I say? I tend to be an "on the dark side" kind of guy... Harsh, perhaps--but is my assessment inaccurate? Aside from the bottom line, corporations love nothing as much as preserving wiggle room. Dave! (20 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
| | | Re: Color Change - Final Update
|
| It's not harsh. It's just a clear statement of what *could* happen. Judging by this color debacle, it's not much of a stretch, either. I have yet to see a clear Business Case answer for the color change. Everything stated to date has been pretty (...) (20 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Color Change - Final Update
|
| (...) It might be worth noting that this doesn't suggest that TLG will actually take AFOL input into consideration--merely that TLG won't make the change without AFOL input. The input might easily be ignored, but TLG can still claim to have accepted (...) (20 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
260 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
